Tbf, and I know you're just trolling anyway but, that blew your "architect" argument out of the water here.

Architect for people here would mean our "creator," or a metaphor for biology for the non-religious. So the "architect" put the hair on the women, as you say he designed them that way, and thus the alteration (removal) should be perceived as sickness, I should suspect Alopecia, but it isn't and I don't. Instead as your source suggests and as I can confirm for me personally I do prefer such a woman altered beyond our architect's designs, I don't see her as sick, I can correctly surmise that she, a tool using primate like myself, likely purchased a razor from a store and removed the hair from where it originally was.

As with the hair even if the tattoo "should" be viewed as a sickness due to a malfunction of our brains, in mine it isn't. As with "shaving" I'm also aware of what "ink" is, tattooed or sharpied frankly, if I see someone wrote a phone number on their wrist (a forgotten rite of passage in the age of the smart phone but for those of us old enough to remember) or an X on their hand I don't think "sick" I think "got a date" or "is under 21 at this band's show" respectively, as my brain (perhaps unlike yours) is capable of interpreting context.

Furthermore many blemishes are not only "non-medical" (birthmarks, etc) some can be downright attractive. Love me a hot pale freckled woman.

Well maybe when one day when you get to enjoy a woman you won't mind so much.

I hope you shave of all of your body hair because it is disgusting on men

if the brain interprets something as something else, it means the brain is wrong. So… again there’s no blemish. It’s clearly the other brain which has issues — the “observer” — not the tattoo bearer.

I suggest you attempt to fix your brain: it clearly malfunctions and this may indicate health problems.