I mean, regardless of the speculative bubble, some people think AI is dumb as a rock when it's not really. Maybe three or four years ago it was, but the gradual improvement is clear as day. This is clearly better than the bots that write webpages before the advent of AI. Although, I still would not trust AI to do more complex tasks in my workplace.

Whether they admit it or not, I just think those who are staunchly anti-AI are averse to the new, and/or thinking that their first experience with the first model of a technology, which tends to be bad, is end-all-be-all. I certainly remember when I thought Bluetooth headphones won't ever improve, because the first models sold had bad connectivity.

I am concerned as well that it would displace us from work. But most of the criticism of AI I met are, frankly, older people who think it's still dumb as a rock and could never improve. Although they don't realise that they are likely experiencing averse reaction to what is new. Meanwhile, the younger people, as we are already talking about, recognise it's improving over time. Hence, the youths being concerned of being put out of job (I never met a young person who still think the AI doesn't have any potential). So the latter group recognise that AI is working, as opposed to the older generations.