this post was submitted on 23 May 2026

197 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

selfhosted@lemmy.world

63,624 readers

5,316 active

337 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

Be civil.
No spam.
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

moderators

ruud@lemmy.world

Loki@lemmy.world

CannaVet@lemmy.world

devve@lemmy.world

ayyy@sh.itjust.works

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

How would you expose Jellyfin securely without a vpn? (discuss.online)

submitted 5 months ago by kiol@discuss.online to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

164 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Assuming the user will not be connecting over vpn, but is both remote and non-technical, how would you expose Jellyfin to them securely?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Cf used to have it against the rules, but it's fine now.

edit: you can in fact do video, but they have added lines about ~piracy

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] kcweller@feddit.nl 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

Ah cool, didn't know!

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago

Just re-read to make sure, they def changes the non-html to allow it, but they do def have non-pirate terms in there

end to end encryption with your own key on their tunnel might be a good idea (which is allowed)

parent