you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They don't use it as admissible evidence, they use it to find out whether someone is worth pursuing in legitimate ways that are more time and effort intensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    That type of investigation would still require a warrant or exigent circumstances at the minimum. Otherwise it's just fishing...which is a violation of Canada's privacy laws. They can't just go rooting through someone's phone looking for a reason to pursue further investigation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments