Agreed, the line is use the bathroom and don't shit on the floor

Get a fucking grip on fucking reality you stupid fucking idiot. Stop inventing things in your head to disagree with you putrid rotting dog cunt.

I see you're not exactly into constructive conversation. Maybe chill out instead of getting so angry at comments online that it sends you into a fit of swearing rage?

justify it

Sure. Any time, any day. I doubt you'll even read past the first sentence given how irrationally angry you seem to be, but maybe you'll prove me wrong.

• The vast majority of people do not even know there are sexes that could be defined outside the binary of male and female. They don't know that chromosome combinations outside XX and XY exist at all.
• When people are told this, many of them refuse to accept it, and simply cast it as "outliers" that in the end, don't change their belief that "there are only 2 sexes", sometimes because their religion simply states there's only 2 against all currently known evidence, or even if they are just more broadly liberal and would still say gender is separate from sex. It is an uncomfortable thing for some to come to terms with to understand that something so deeply ingrained into our culture is much more complicated than it seems at a glance.
• This has been a known fact for centuries, and yet society broadly still assumes, by default, that it is "abnormal" and "undesirable", so surgeries are often performed on intersex individuals as babies to "correct" their sex characteristics to match just the two binary options most people are familiar with, even if that individual later finds out and would otherwise have not wanted the surgery.
• To this day, people like you are continuing to call people like me a "putrid rotting dog cunt" for explaining this well-researched, broadly demonstrated topic with widespread occurrences across the globe, when the more reasonable answer to being told such a fact would be to spend even a minute on any search engine to find out you're going against the whole of medical consensus and seemingly getting incredibly incensed over the fact that nobody agrees with you.

This just goes to show transphobes and bigots refuse to learn about the reality we live in and instead lash out because something doesn’t fit their worldview.

Should have figured you'd cite a known anti-trans organization that distorts scientific reality to make a point. (oh boy, I sure do wonder why they have an article titled "8-Step Action Plan to Eliminate Gender Ideology", surely because they actually understand broadly accepted and heavily researched science and not because they just want to make a political point while sounding scientific!)

They think sex can only be determined by gametes. This ignores the fundamental reality that many humans do not produce either of them while retaining wholly ambiguous or non-ambiguous reproductive organs, that some humans can produce both (albeit rarely), or that some humans lose or gain the ability to produce one throughout their lives. (not producing ova until puberty? Tough luck, guess you're not a female! Body hasn't fully developed internal reproductive organs until later in life? Guess you're sex-less until then! Does your body never produce sperm or ova because of a genetic issue? Guess it's impossible to assign you a sex!)

It also ignores the fact that we tend to classify sex based on phenotypic characteristics. If someone has a penis, generally masculine face and fat distribution, but XX chromosomes and is still able to sometimes produce ova while not producing sperm, even if they're missing the rest of the necessary reproductive functions, for all intensive purposes, you would call that person male. If every other part of their body is typically male, there is no reason to continually insist that person is actually a female because somewhere inside their body they can produce ova that don't do anything.

If sex is determined by gametes, there are exceptions to the rule that can't be classified solely as one or the other.

If sex is determined by chromosomes, then any exception from XX or XY disproves the rule.

If sex is determined by phenotypic characteristics, then we see a spectrum in how they present.

This also simply ignores the fundamental reality that even if you can oversimplify a complex condition into one of two more common options, it doesn't mean that is correct or accurate to do so.

To use the analogy I used before, you could say that all numbers for simplicity, should be rounded to either 1 or 0, even if it's 0.9, 0.2, or 0.2398547293875. That could be useful shorthand, and it could generally describe semi-closely how those numbers would operate within a broadly binary system, but at the end of the day those numbers are not 0 or 1.

Claiming that "0.9 = 1" would be stupid.

Claiming "0.9 is basically 1 so why bother ever giving it a different label" would be stupid.

Claiming "0.9 is close enough to 1 to not make a huge difference in outward perception and day-to-day use, so we can rely on it for shorthand while understanding 0.9 is not 1" would be very reasonable.

You cannot look at a spectrum, say "they're still within the other 2, therefore there's only 2", and call it a day.

It's true these conditions can present similarly to one of the two typical male or female sets of characteristics, or that they can derive from what are often the typical chromosomes of either group. It's not true that they are male or female and there is only a binary and nothing else.

i mean, you're literally wrong?