Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don't know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it's not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I'm being snarky, but that "I'm so mature" bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 6 months ago (23 children)

Bullshit you just fucking did.

I said AI is handy to summarize. You said use it to moderate. Normally I'd just block someone like you, but I want to make sure I can report you when you lie again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 6 months ago* (22 children)

    I said AI is handy to summarize

    ...for making moderation decisions. Using AI in the moderation process instead of a human review. That's so extreme not even Flatworm (The person who generated the AI report) is willing to claim they did.

    It's weird you turned into such a pedant after telling me words in quote marks don't need to be exact quotes. Selective outrage I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    It's not an either/or situation. I manually reviewed it, came to a conclusion, then generated the AI summary to see if it was any good. And then I manually banned that user. You are implying a much bigger role for AI than it actually played.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Does that mean the ban reason in the mod log isn't the ban reason?

    • What value did you get out of the AI generation when deciding on the ban (assuming none based on your reply)?
    • Maybe more importantly, what value are you attributing to it for those who actually read the logs?

    Were the quotes in the AI summary actually used for "seeing if it was any good" at the time, and if so, what was the concision?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    LYING AGAIN.

    Using AI to summarize and find the comments, then a person reviews, which I said HOURS before you commented.

    Stop making shit up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago (18 children)

    A person reviews... The summary? The one with incorrect quotes (which doesn't bother you for some reason)? Even Flatworm claims the AI summary was not used in their moderation decision.

    the summary did a much more comprehensive justification of the ban than I could have fitted in the modlog, so why not include it?

    You can keep being pedantic, but you're calling for more AI in the moderation than even db0 admins want to endorse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago* (17 children)

    You check a summary, which makes specific references. Which you can then use to find the exact comments.

    Otherwise you have to manually look page by page through comments.

    If this concept is hard for you, a remedial English class may help. Its how many documents get written, and would be reviewed in such a class.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (16 children)

    Thank you for explaining how you want administrators to use AI even more than they (allegedly) already do. You don't need to keep going

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    Same thing ive said since the beginning, I'm sorry reading is clearly so tough for you.

    With practice you can improve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (14 children)

    Same thing I said you said. Good luck with your remedial classes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (13 children)

    👋

    (I thought an emoji would be easier for you)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    Nah, I took a break from teaching actually.

    Seriously though, you are demonstrating functional illiteracy. You are mixing statements around, which is either intentional and clearly misinformation, or unintentional, in which case you really should get some remedial classes as youre operating at a 6th grade level (struggling with abstract concepts and separate references).

    Good luck out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    You definitely have the temperament of a good teacher...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    I made the mistake of assuming you were literate, which would mean that you chose to lie about what I said.

    In class I know going in that they need to learn the basics. Thats why I'm calm now, I now know you need some assistance. You're not a liar, you just have reading comprehension problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Very not mad, yes. Do you recall how quote marks work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Wow right back again to complain about punctuation for a summary!

    I can't do this all day bud, so let's recap.

    The top is a summary, below there are direct comment quotes and links to them.

    You are currently complaining about the use of quotes for paraphrased language, which should ideally be separated with italics or something, but its markdown, so generated summaries usually use quotes instead.

    Do you know what a "summary" is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    Are summaries where I can make up things you didn't actually say, and put them in quote marks?

    If that's true, assume I've been summarizing you this whole time 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    where I can make up things you didn't actually say

    You've been doing that the whole time, what's the difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 6 months ago (5 children)
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -5 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -4 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -4 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] -4 points 6 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] -4 points 6 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No I’m talking to you and your horrible bad faith interactions designed to rile shit up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)