from the mod log:

Mojng5xTnVM7YHd.png

https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek was the old url but they took it down - I have a copy at https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

The output from the LLM was provided as proof that someone needed to be banned.

I didn't want to do this but my hand was forced by their dissembling, minimization and bullshit. Note how the output includes a nice big logo with a slogan and ascii graphics - this was not a one-off experiment, this is an app they were proud to call their own.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 6 months ago* (10 children)

Full comments with direct links are there, thats the summary up top, just scroll down.

Edit: https://faf-pb.xyz/?ab3c4aae88b64dbc#J8jz6mNac8kRHm5aMXBJQjbUr9pbwMfWrdEaNm1jywhx if you want to see for yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (9 children)

    Don't be dishonest. You know there are no direct quotes there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    The quoted comments are directly quoted with links.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    You are lying. The AI Sloppary says

    Claims that β€œminors are not innocent by default”

    Now show us exactly where this exact quoted text in the comment dump. With links, the things you swear you have!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    ========================================

    Date: 2026-03-15T10:53:32.311868Z Comment ID: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/24299783 Post ID: 519441 Community ID: 45

    Just because they are minors, doesn’t make them innocent by default.

    The whole article is devoid of details on how these drones are used.

    ========================================

    Whats the prob Bob?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Look at that, the words don't match what's in the quote marks, and it has a slightly different meaning. My whole point.

    I'm almost impressed that you can lie this hard while acting correct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    SUMMARY.

    Holy shit are you dense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Summary, sloppary, whatever you call it: the thing you claimed you could find the exact text for, and then didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    No, I said quite clearly that I'd like to see the comment misquoted.

    You then quoted the summary and said "BUT IT USED QUOTES"

    They paraphrase. I said that, too. Your complaint is about punctuation, probably the dumbest complaint ive seen on this entire thread.

    So cut the crap, stop lying about what I said, and stop pretending that it was an inaccurate summary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I said quite clearly that I'd like to see the comment misquoted.

    That's a you problem. I never accepted your attempt to reframe the conversation.

    your complaint is about punctuation

    No, it's not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    That's a you problem. I never accepted your attempt to reframe the conversation.

    Its what I have said from.the start, I don't really care about your attempt to reframe it.

    No, it's not.

    "Wahhh, its using quotes, that means exact"

    Uh huh. Sure thing.

  • source
  • parent