What's with the downvotes? The article makes good points, and brings them across politely:

• it's a $100M for-profit company
• it's heavy (compared to Vaultwarden, a Bitwarden compatible Rust rewrite)
• its code base requires proprietary MS libraries and other esoteric (seen from the POV of a *nix user) stuff. I might have summarized this one badly, just read the chapter, it's not long.

My guess is people are salty because

• they use Bitwarden and don't like to see it criticized
• they got upset by the javascript overlay which is hilarious imo. I certainly got rick-rolled for a hot second.

FWIW, I don't serve my password database on the www at all. It sits on my own server and I can access it with all my devices, but the software to do that is local only.