I did some analysis of the modlog and found this:

V8lPrxY1qxcISLe.png

Ok, bigger instances ban more often. Not surprising, because they have more communities and more users and more trouble. But hang on, dbzer0 isn't a very big instance. What happens if we do a ratio of bans vs number of users?

vyfUNYTrX9pHQeR.png

Ok, so lemmy.ml, dbzer0 and pawb are issue an outsized amount of bans for the number of users they have... But surely the number of communities the instance hosts is going to mean they have to ban more? Bans are used to moderate communities, not just to shield their user-base from the outside. Let's look at the number of bans per community hosted:

Yrc7TofOr88SeGt.png

Seems like dbzer0 really loves to ban. Even more than the marxists and the furries! What is it about dbzer0 that makes them such prolific banners?

Raw-ish numbers and calculations are in this spreadsheet if anyone wants to make their own charts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 6 months ago (25 children)

So, yes you banned a community moderated by multiple users because you personally felt slighted at being banned by one person.

Thanks for the explanation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    Its like some admins have zero concept of consensus or community-based decision making. They just wanna play server daddy, and daddy always knows best. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago (15 children)

    I spent 8 years in organisations that operated with consensus-based decision making. IRL, not larping online.

    You don't know me. Even a little bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    And yet you don't see an issue with the way this was handled?

    So, yes you banned a community moderated by multiple users because you personally felt slighted at being banned by one person.

    I don't need to know you, I just observe what actions you take. You went off half cocked in this post like it was some sort of gotcha.

    Also not sure why you suddenly have it in for our instance recently. It seems like you've thrown in your hat with Kaplan who is seemingly determined to get rid of the last remaining leftist instances. That's extremely disappointing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago*

    And yet you don’t see an issue with the way this was handled?

    They never will.

    Also not sure why you suddenly have it in for our instance recently.

    Always has, we don't support liberal capitalism. That's worse than the fascists they hang out with, while claiming they fight fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Also not sure why you suddenly have it in for our instance recently.

    Being labelled as a Zionist is probably the reason.

    When this was discussed last week with db0, db0 said to just move on as people tend to call everyone a lot of things on the Internet.

    On the other hand, it could also be expected than instance admins take actions against this type of disinformation. Dbzer0 staff prefers not too for ideological reasons, but that's the core of the disagreement: should instance admins allow mods to spread disinformation in modlogs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    If Rimu wants us to reverse a misguided community ban by a community mod I'd be happy to do so. But he hasn't even asked afaik. We are actually quite reasonable people, despite claims to the contrary.

    I don't have any particular beef with Rimu except for the current hostility towards our admin team. And hit jobs like this post are not helpful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Ok so you know about consensus-based decisionmaking but refuse to implement it. You understand that's worse right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    They don't understand anything that wasn't hard coded into their mind like PieFed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (2 children)

    That’s why you made the choice to code in your biases into PieFed without reaching a consensus with anyone first.

    You must love how the top communities on .social are all meme communities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You don’t know me. Even a little bit.

    Your actions are louder than your words. Your continued bad faith and constant siding with other bad faith actors are bigger than your empty platitudes and statements.

    Your personality is reflected in your actions. You're a digital dictator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    You’re a digital dictator.

    That's completely false and borderline harassment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Calling in someone's documented actions and bad faith isn't harassment, it's the truth.

    Supporting doctored screenshots and spreading lies is harassment, that's why Rimu has done in the last month.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com has returned to piefed.social after we confirmed that the moderator in questions mod-logs would not continue to federate out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment