you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Oh no, if it isn't the consequences of everyone's collective actions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 6 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    That's such a nonsense argument. 80% of the US lives in an urban area. That has plenty of options for walkable neighborhoods with public transportation. The reason that those don't exist are active policy choices that people have voted for and keep voting for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 6 months ago* (5 children)

    Have you even been to the US? Even most of the urban areas have horrible public transit and even worse infrastructure for biking.

    Maybe get off your high horse and engage in reality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

    I think that's exactly what that person is saying though. There is plenty of opportunity for good public infrastructure, but bad policy and auto lobbies have prevented them from happening. A good example is how most neighborhoods are not allowed to be located with businesses/shops/restaurants, and vice versa. This simple change would make so much more of the country more walkable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    The shitty thing is before WW2, America had some of the best public and most profitable transportation infrastructure in the world. American railroad tycoons were some of the most wealthy individuals in the nation for a time even and before that it was steamboat tycoons. As you say auto lobbyist ruined it all unfortunately and AmTrak is a sad excuse of what’s left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe vote for somebody who will give you better public transport and cycling infrastructure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Naive take at best. Love the tone deaf armchair "advice" all the non-Americans have for us, like you've been through this before and led a political movement yourself to earn the social safety nets/benefits your country provides for you. I'm sure you fought for everything you enjoy, lol.

    No doubt, getting everyone convinced to vote is a good thing, but the majority of this comes down to money in politics, which will take a fucking revolution to change, not a ballot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Living in a country under laws written by oil corporations, in cities whose public transportation was privatized and destroyed by car manufacturers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago*

    Commuting from the suburbs to the city center is a perfect use case for advanced high-capacity public transportation. It's something that most cities on earth manage, the US could too.

    Also this isn't theoretical. The deliberate prevention of new and in some cases destruction of existing public transportation in the US to increase car dependency is well-documented.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)