you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 6 months ago (18 children)

Genuine question. How is NPM more vulnerable than other repos? Haven't similar supply chain attacks succeeded at least as well as this one through GitHub itself and even Linux package repos?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    Larger standard libraries do a lot. It's a lot harder to sneak vulnerabilities into the basic C# or Java or C++ libraries than it is to add a vulnerability to something one dude maintains in the javascript ecosystem.

    And since javascript libraries tend to be so small and focused, it's become standard practice for even other libraries to pull in as many of those as they want.

    And it stacks. Your libraries pull in other libraries which can pull in their own libraries. I had a project recently where I had maybe a dozen direct dependencies and they ended up pulling in 1,311 total libraries, largely all maintained by different people.

    In a more sane ecosystem like C#, all the basics like string manipulation, email, or logging have libraries provided by Microsoft that have oversight when they're changed. There can be better, third-party libraries for these things (log4net is pretty great), but they have to compete with their reputation and value over the standard library, which tends to be a high bar. And libraries made on top of that system are generally pulling all those same, certified standard libraries. So you pull in 3 libraries and only one of those pulls in another third party single library. And you end up with 4 total third party libraries.

    Javascript just doesn't really have a certified standard library.

    (This certified standard library doesn't have to be proprietary. Microsoft has made C# open source, and Linus Torvalds with the Linux Kernel Organization holds ultimate responsibility for the Linux kernel.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    I will almost always choose .NET as my development platform when greenfielding a project for exactly this reason. It's an incredibly robust standard library that virtually guarantees I won't need to pull in a litany of additional utility libraries, and I can also expect that what libraries I do choose to bring in are highly unlikely to drag along a ridiculous parade of dependencies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    will almost always choose .NET as my development

    Do you feel its still worth learning now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Probably more worth than it was 15 years ago since you're no longer restricted to Windows and it's now open source. I've heard a lot of people say it's nicer than Spring for enterprise stuff. Haven't tried it much myself though. Was fairly easy to set up a simple API, but I then got distracted by other projects.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, it's incredibly nice, versatile, powerful and efficient. Me being a .net dev since first beta. That said it's still a GC based runtime if that matters to you. I'm also looking more and more at kotlin as an alternative. If I was to look for a non GC language, I'd go with rust.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I don't think you'll find another major repo with so many real-world incidents though. Whether this is because of a systemic problem or just because it's targeted more frequently, I'm not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    As much as some people deride it Javascript is one of the most used languages on the planet.

    This is basically the same as people thinking windows is less secure because it's more often targeted.

    JavaScript does have a bit of a problem with dependencies but it isn't much different than other languages with built in package managers like rust. It's just a bigger juicer target.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    But Windows is less secure. Two things can be true at once. They are in the original topic too.

    The Java ecosystem is massive and decades old and I don't hear one iota of the shit about maven central that I hear about npm.

    I guarantee that npm is full up with vibe coded bullshit at this point as well.

    I'm not sure what it even takes to upload a package to npm. Not even a pulse. I honestly never looked into it because the whole ecosystem is so rancid.

    EDIT: Look at how many shits in this are optional (and note the overall quality of the article as well): https://dev.to/aneshodza/publishing-your-first-npm-library-51k2. The ecosystem sucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    There's a lot of features that make it a better package manager but nobody cares. Every project has hundreds of dependencies and packages use a minimum, not exact, version.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    That sounds more like bad practices from the community. It definitely has ways to use exact versions. Not the least of which the lock file. Or the shrinkwrap file which public packages should be using.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Any security system based on expecting good behavior from people is sure to fail. If NPM has no estructural features to enforce safe behaviors, it is vulnerable by default. As no person using it will apply safe practices unless forced to. Specially if the default, easiest, less friction behavior, is inherently unsafe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment