▲ 447 ▼ AI warfare triggers Putin, as Kremlin moves to dismantle the last pieces of Russian internet: More and more restrictions are being imposed on the internet in Russia (globalvoices.org) submitted 6 months ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world 63 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 19 points 6 months ago (11 children) "It's for the CHILDREN, you COMMIE!" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -17 points 6 months ago* (10 children) People keep repeating these platitudes as if digital products aren't literally harmful to kids. (And purposefully designed that way.) But okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago (2 children) Do your job as a fucking parent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) They don't. That is why regulation is necessary. Just like how expecting people to recycle was bad policy. Though I wouldn't be opposed to there being statutory regulations against parents whose kids get addicted to these applications and end up self-deleting or causing harm to others, not unlike how we're seeing the state start to go after parents who fail to secure their guns. But just trusting parents to parent isn't an option anymore. There's simply too much evidence of the harm these applications cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* I have some sympathy with your view, but still downvoted because I refuse to accept it's conclusion. Look at Japan, Scandinavia and many other countries where social responsibility still prevails. Throwing hands up and saying "well it's just human nature" is the laziest get-out to avoid fixing the broken parts of ones own excessive, hedonistic culture. It might be true that the ones that need to be convinced won't listen to the argument itself. But we can start to re-empower more responsible citizens to impose shame - yes, fucking shame - on those that raise their kids and otherwise act irresponsibly in so many ways: the polluting shit they consume, the regimes they support with the subscriptions they pay for, the inefficient gas guzzlers they decide to drive off the forecourt. It needs checking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago By all means, utilize the parental controls on your children's devices to keep them away from harmful content. But keep the government out of people's personal devices, and stop attacking the basic concepts of anonymity, privacy, and data security. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mistic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago This screams: "I don't want to parent my kids, so let the government do it instead, and do it to me too along the way." Do you really not see how that takes away your own agency? Both in terms of raising your kids and your own privacy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Domino 14 points 6 months ago (4 children) Please keep repeating this propaganda as if it were true. Australian studies have shown that the social media ban is harmful for children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -12 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Domino 12 points 6 months ago 🙄Who uses “SJW” in 2026? At least call me woke or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago Maybe money should be dumped into education and evidence-based science... instead of what people "feel" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago thanks for putting such a big smile on my face, taking me back to a time of sjw's. your username is a perfect representation of your views on lemmy dawg. permalink fedilink source parent [–] No1@aussie.zone 1 point 6 months ago TL;DR permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -17 points 6 months ago* (10 children) People keep repeating these platitudes as if digital products aren't literally harmful to kids. (And purposefully designed that way.) But okay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago (2 children) Do your job as a fucking parent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) They don't. That is why regulation is necessary. Just like how expecting people to recycle was bad policy. Though I wouldn't be opposed to there being statutory regulations against parents whose kids get addicted to these applications and end up self-deleting or causing harm to others, not unlike how we're seeing the state start to go after parents who fail to secure their guns. But just trusting parents to parent isn't an option anymore. There's simply too much evidence of the harm these applications cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* I have some sympathy with your view, but still downvoted because I refuse to accept it's conclusion. Look at Japan, Scandinavia and many other countries where social responsibility still prevails. Throwing hands up and saying "well it's just human nature" is the laziest get-out to avoid fixing the broken parts of ones own excessive, hedonistic culture. It might be true that the ones that need to be convinced won't listen to the argument itself. But we can start to re-empower more responsible citizens to impose shame - yes, fucking shame - on those that raise their kids and otherwise act irresponsibly in so many ways: the polluting shit they consume, the regimes they support with the subscriptions they pay for, the inefficient gas guzzlers they decide to drive off the forecourt. It needs checking. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago By all means, utilize the parental controls on your children's devices to keep them away from harmful content. But keep the government out of people's personal devices, and stop attacking the basic concepts of anonymity, privacy, and data security. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mistic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago This screams: "I don't want to parent my kids, so let the government do it instead, and do it to me too along the way." Do you really not see how that takes away your own agency? Both in terms of raising your kids and your own privacy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Domino 14 points 6 months ago (4 children) Please keep repeating this propaganda as if it were true. Australian studies have shown that the social media ban is harmful for children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -12 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Domino 12 points 6 months ago 🙄Who uses “SJW” in 2026? At least call me woke or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago Maybe money should be dumped into education and evidence-based science... instead of what people "feel" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago thanks for putting such a big smile on my face, taking me back to a time of sjw's. your username is a perfect representation of your views on lemmy dawg. permalink fedilink source parent [–] No1@aussie.zone 1 point 6 months ago TL;DR permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 months ago (2 children) Do your job as a fucking parent. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) They don't. That is why regulation is necessary. Just like how expecting people to recycle was bad policy. Though I wouldn't be opposed to there being statutory regulations against parents whose kids get addicted to these applications and end up self-deleting or causing harm to others, not unlike how we're seeing the state start to go after parents who fail to secure their guns. But just trusting parents to parent isn't an option anymore. There's simply too much evidence of the harm these applications cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* I have some sympathy with your view, but still downvoted because I refuse to accept it's conclusion. Look at Japan, Scandinavia and many other countries where social responsibility still prevails. Throwing hands up and saying "well it's just human nature" is the laziest get-out to avoid fixing the broken parts of ones own excessive, hedonistic culture. It might be true that the ones that need to be convinced won't listen to the argument itself. But we can start to re-empower more responsible citizens to impose shame - yes, fucking shame - on those that raise their kids and otherwise act irresponsibly in so many ways: the polluting shit they consume, the regimes they support with the subscriptions they pay for, the inefficient gas guzzlers they decide to drive off the forecourt. It needs checking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child) They don't. That is why regulation is necessary. Just like how expecting people to recycle was bad policy. Though I wouldn't be opposed to there being statutory regulations against parents whose kids get addicted to these applications and end up self-deleting or causing harm to others, not unlike how we're seeing the state start to go after parents who fail to secure their guns. But just trusting parents to parent isn't an option anymore. There's simply too much evidence of the harm these applications cause. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* I have some sympathy with your view, but still downvoted because I refuse to accept it's conclusion. Look at Japan, Scandinavia and many other countries where social responsibility still prevails. Throwing hands up and saying "well it's just human nature" is the laziest get-out to avoid fixing the broken parts of ones own excessive, hedonistic culture. It might be true that the ones that need to be convinced won't listen to the argument itself. But we can start to re-empower more responsible citizens to impose shame - yes, fucking shame - on those that raise their kids and otherwise act irresponsibly in so many ways: the polluting shit they consume, the regimes they support with the subscriptions they pay for, the inefficient gas guzzlers they decide to drive off the forecourt. It needs checking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Darkmoon_AU@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago* I have some sympathy with your view, but still downvoted because I refuse to accept it's conclusion. Look at Japan, Scandinavia and many other countries where social responsibility still prevails. Throwing hands up and saying "well it's just human nature" is the laziest get-out to avoid fixing the broken parts of ones own excessive, hedonistic culture. It might be true that the ones that need to be convinced won't listen to the argument itself. But we can start to re-empower more responsible citizens to impose shame - yes, fucking shame - on those that raise their kids and otherwise act irresponsibly in so many ways: the polluting shit they consume, the regimes they support with the subscriptions they pay for, the inefficient gas guzzlers they decide to drive off the forecourt. It needs checking. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 6 months ago By all means, utilize the parental controls on your children's devices to keep them away from harmful content. But keep the government out of people's personal devices, and stop attacking the basic concepts of anonymity, privacy, and data security. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mistic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago This screams: "I don't want to parent my kids, so let the government do it instead, and do it to me too along the way." Do you really not see how that takes away your own agency? Both in terms of raising your kids and your own privacy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Domino 14 points 6 months ago (4 children) Please keep repeating this propaganda as if it were true. Australian studies have shown that the social media ban is harmful for children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -12 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Domino 12 points 6 months ago 🙄Who uses “SJW” in 2026? At least call me woke or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago Maybe money should be dumped into education and evidence-based science... instead of what people "feel" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago thanks for putting such a big smile on my face, taking me back to a time of sjw's. your username is a perfect representation of your views on lemmy dawg. permalink fedilink source parent [–] No1@aussie.zone 1 point 6 months ago TL;DR permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -12 points 6 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Domino 12 points 6 months ago 🙄Who uses “SJW” in 2026? At least call me woke or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago Maybe money should be dumped into education and evidence-based science... instead of what people "feel" permalink fedilink source parent [–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago thanks for putting such a big smile on my face, taking me back to a time of sjw's. your username is a perfect representation of your views on lemmy dawg. permalink fedilink source parent [–] No1@aussie.zone 1 point 6 months ago TL;DR permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Domino 12 points 6 months ago 🙄Who uses “SJW” in 2026? At least call me woke or whatever. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 8 points 6 months ago Maybe money should be dumped into education and evidence-based science... instead of what people "feel" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago thanks for putting such a big smile on my face, taking me back to a time of sjw's. your username is a perfect representation of your views on lemmy dawg. permalink fedilink source parent