โฒ 352 โผ This seems mildly dystopian (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/justpost@lemmy.world 55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Bocky@lemmy.world -16 points 1 year ago (7 children) This tech is still relevant in 2025? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [โ] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 year ago (6 children) What tech? Wifi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [โ] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children) I thought OpenWrt was kind of dead. Everyone uses pfsense as their open source router. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Bocky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) ddwrt is what I was thinking of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago IMO, pfsense is for if you want to use an x86 PC as a router, while OpenWRT is for if you want your ARM-based commodity home router to run open source firmware. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago it's not just for routers. you can (and should) use it on your access points. I have six APs in my house for 100% WiFi coverage inside and outside my home. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Iโm actually so incredibly lazy I use a firewalla purple. And I love it. Youโll never take it away from me! Hiss!!!! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[โ] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 year ago (6 children) What tech? Wifi? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [โ] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children) I thought OpenWrt was kind of dead. Everyone uses pfsense as their open source router. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Bocky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) ddwrt is what I was thinking of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago IMO, pfsense is for if you want to use an x86 PC as a router, while OpenWRT is for if you want your ARM-based commodity home router to run open source firmware. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago it's not just for routers. you can (and should) use it on your access points. I have six APs in my house for 100% WiFi coverage inside and outside my home. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Iโm actually so incredibly lazy I use a firewalla purple. And I love it. Youโll never take it away from me! Hiss!!!! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[โ] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (5 children) I thought OpenWrt was kind of dead. Everyone uses pfsense as their open source router. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Bocky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) ddwrt is what I was thinking of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago IMO, pfsense is for if you want to use an x86 PC as a router, while OpenWRT is for if you want your ARM-based commodity home router to run open source firmware. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago it's not just for routers. you can (and should) use it on your access points. I have six APs in my house for 100% WiFi coverage inside and outside my home. permalink fedilink source parent [โ] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Iโm actually so incredibly lazy I use a firewalla purple. And I love it. Youโll never take it away from me! Hiss!!!! permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] Turret3857@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] Bocky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) ddwrt is what I was thinking of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] Bocky@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) ddwrt is what I was thinking of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] cellardoor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago Can second the other comments. OpenWRT is alive and well in parallel to PfSense. Different use cases for each. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago IMO, pfsense is for if you want to use an x86 PC as a router, while OpenWRT is for if you want your ARM-based commodity home router to run open source firmware. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago it's not just for routers. you can (and should) use it on your access points. I have six APs in my house for 100% WiFi coverage inside and outside my home. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Iโm actually so incredibly lazy I use a firewalla purple. And I love it. Youโll never take it away from me! Hiss!!!! permalink fedilink source parent
