▲ 815 ▼ AI Company Clones Musician’s Voice, Then Copyright-Strikes Her Own Songs (rudevulture.com) submitted 7 months ago by 0x0@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world 68 comments fedilink hide all child comments As crappy as it sounds.
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -3 points 7 months ago (3 children) Lets not throw out freedom of panorama because of AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 12 points 7 months ago (2 children) What does that have to do with anything here?? I don't know about you, but my likeness is not permanently located in a public space... Freedom of panorama (FoP) is a provision in the copyright laws of various jurisdictions that permits taking photographs and video footage and creating other images (such as paintings) of buildings and sometimes sculptures and other art works which are permanently located in a public space, without infringing on any copyright that may otherwise subsist in such works, and the publishing of such images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -1 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* It's not impossible at all. You just have to blur the faces and any identifying marks unless you've obtained explicit consent. Kind people already do this regularly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 12 points 7 months ago (2 children) What does that have to do with anything here?? I don't know about you, but my likeness is not permanently located in a public space... Freedom of panorama (FoP) is a provision in the copyright laws of various jurisdictions that permits taking photographs and video footage and creating other images (such as paintings) of buildings and sometimes sculptures and other art works which are permanently located in a public space, without infringing on any copyright that may otherwise subsist in such works, and the publishing of such images. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -1 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* It's not impossible at all. You just have to blur the faces and any identifying marks unless you've obtained explicit consent. Kind people already do this regularly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -1 points 7 months ago (1 child) I'm not sure of the correct term. It should be obvious though that if anyone can copyright claim their own image, it would basically make taking photos in many public places impossible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* It's not impossible at all. You just have to blur the faces and any identifying marks unless you've obtained explicit consent. Kind people already do this regularly. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stray@pawb.social 5 points 7 months ago* It's not impossible at all. You just have to blur the faces and any identifying marks unless you've obtained explicit consent. Kind people already do this regularly. permalink fedilink source parent