edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting

feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

You are right you didn’t say it doesn’t, nor would I ever shove words in your mouth like that.

What you did say is “[your examples showing an ongoing issue between before 1920-today] are from 60 years ago” blatantly false! 2025 is today. ;)

You act as though I railed against the notion of voter suppression

No I act as though, under a comment affirming the dignity of the oppressed despite their separation from democratic self-determination, you started chirping about how I’m ignoring trans people or something. That’s pretty disingenuous to me, sorry not sorry.

e:typos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Fucking hell, let me copy it for you again:

    Those examples are from 105 and 60 years ago.
    There are ways to make the point you're going for, but invoking legislation that old doesn't do it.

    Do you see how maybe that was more of a comment about a weak example rather than disagreement?

    You were "chirping" squawking blathering talking about how we need class consciousness rather than culture war. Maybe if you actually read what I wrote from a non-confrontational view you could understand that I was saying "victims of a culture war can't ignore it".

  • source
  • parent