1276
Grok, even in its manipulated state, continues to emphasize the facts. And that's hurting the feelings of a lot of Twitter users. (discuss.online)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://xcancel.com/grok/status/1941506767046967650#m

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 243 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Facts over feelings??? Yup definitely an AI designed by a douche bag

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 180 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's funny because the people who usually say that are the kind of people who prioritize their feelings over facts.

    It's all projection with conservatives

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Funny thing is that an AI has no feelings, and such a phrase in the prompt would be interpreted simply as "be harshly true" instead of "be super confident on things that cannot be verified"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    Problem? Seems as good a way as any to say conflicting feelings can go suck a dick when they need to reconcile with these facts over here. Dumb to get peeved over that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Facts over feelings" has been used almost exclusively by conservative "influencers" for the last decade (despite them not really caring about facts, mind you). It's a dog whistle at this point for being a massive dickwad.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Maybe unlearn that or learn to throw it back?

    Letting the other camp "own" signs like fake news, 👌🏼, or facts over feelings is basically cooperating with them & validating whatever they decide those signs mean for the rest of us. Yet the literal meaning of those words (& signs) can serve anyone. Language can be creative, no?

    Instead of ceding to them like a bunch of feeble losers (and implying we only argue with feelings), maybe we should reappropriate what was given, stir confusion, apply some creativity to make those signs serve us against the "dickwads" we oppose?

    That purity mentality of recoiling from anything "tainted" by those we oppose isn't useful. It's better to restore, redeem, create.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent