supersquirrel comments on The hypercurious mind: ADHD isn’t merely a dysfunction. It’s best understood as an impulsive motivational drive for novel information

The hypercurious mind: ADHD isn’t merely a dysfunction. It’s best understood as an impulsive motivational drive for novel information (aeon.co)

submitted 7 months ago by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/longreads@sh.itjust.works

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hypercuriosity offers a useful lens for understanding many puzzling aspects of ADHD. It explains why attention shifts so readily in low-stakes, repetitive contexts, yet locks in place when a problem is urgent or rich with unknowns. It also helps many familiar features of ADHD fall into place. Rapid changes of focus reflect sensitivity to what feels promising in the moment. Distractibility reflects the presence of several competing leads, where attention is consistently drawn toward the most motivationally salient stimuli – whatever offers the greatest expected informational reward, whether that’s a new idea, an intriguing problem or an exciting possibility. And it might help explain more than is obvious at first glance. People often lose track of time when their attention locks on to something that feels immediately rewarding or mentally stimulating. The difficulty with boring conversations isn’t just about attention but about the painful absence of anything new to learn. Even racing thoughts at bedtime can reflect a mind that keeps generating new possibilities to explore, unable to stop asking ‘What if?’ or ‘What about?’ Taken together, these experiences point to hypercuriosity as a potential key driver of where attention goes and how long it stays there.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz [S] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I think ADHD (I have it too) is best described as a quality of life impacting lack of executive function control in a given context. It is a sort of state of longterm executive function drought in a mental landscape of plants that really need more executive function to grow then they are getting so it becomes a constant process of triage.

The thing is, that is a description of an end state, not a mechanism really. If you sleep deprive "neurotypical" people you can induce a temporary pseudo-state of ADHD where they begin to lose executive function ability. There are many ways for someone to be pushed into executive function burnout too.

In my mind ADHD has to be spoken of from that framing because it has always been a condition defined by symptoms. ADHD is the set of people who cannot be reasonably expected to escape a state of executive function drought symptoms given the context they are forced to live amid. It almost would defy common sense for there only to be one root cause of people ending up there over and over again, it is a place to me, a physical experience any body could potentially encounter at least briefly. The point is not that all ADHD people have some magic physical identifier that unites them all, the point to the concept of ADHD is about caring for people who cannot fulfill the volume of executive function demands placed on them in daily life no matter what continually places them in that state.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

I think you're putting the cart before the horse. "Adhd" is a code we use, a communication tool.

There's no benefit to thinking super hard about what "adhd" means, the benefit is to just using the word to help people. Yes, researches should think super hard about how to help the people the study, but the four letters adhd are just four letters, not some kind of truth we must derive.

Personally, i think we could just stop using it. The way experts use it, they all agree adhd can have wildly different expressions and causes, so what's the point? If a person is having problem that psychology and/or psychiatry help, then great let's get that help.

But if you and me both have "adhd" and we both have very different behaviors/symptoms and causes, then what is the usefulness of that terminology??

Adhd can be neurological (e.g. genetic hormonal imbalance), psychological (childhood trauma leading to long term anxiety and focus issues), or even physiological (poor nutrition/sleep).

So adhd may just be a symptom even vaguer than a fever that has a myriad possible causes and expressions. Am i a fever person when i have a fever? How is that terminology helpful?