that's it. nothing more to really add to it. it's quite simple.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

I think that's an iffy area, because whats the differentiation between "The image I found was already like that" and someone intentionally removing it.

Unless they admitted to it like some have, I don't see that as easily enforceable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, but personally I would do it on a "good faith" system. If someone accidentally put a cropped comic, and someone calls them out, if they edit it back it's fine. But if they repeatedly post cropped comics, they get banned

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I agree a good faith system would be best, I think it would be a good idea to ban or delete posts where they have admitted that they cropped it but, I think forcing a must have source or repeated no source type rule isn't going to be a good route. It will disincentivize people from wanting to post in the first place if they don't already have a source on the post. Some may prefer that but, honestly on an already low userbase platform, I don't think that's a good thing.

  • source
  • parent