You're kinda proving my point. The reason why you don't see it as kinky is because it's so common. If it wasn't common and normalized, people would see it as a kink. I'm kink-positive; I don't have a problem with that. What I find interesting is how accepted and ubiquitous this one kink has become, and I think we have porn to thank for that.

It's not really a modern thing as such either. The kama sutra features a ton of it, including gay and lesbian versions.

Well, that isn't really surprising. I think you would have a really hard... er, difficult time finding a new kink. People have been horny for as long as there have been people, and every imaginable configuration has been tried out thousands of years ago. Except for vibrators or any of the other modern sex toys? Because those didn't exist before.

The person you are interacting with is trying to browbeat you because they don't like what you are saying because they have some weird anti-porn beliefs, which frankly, a lot of people do. They themselves are falling trap to the 'porn corrupts' anti-sex narrative, while seemingly being critical of anti-sex narratives. I see this all the time.

And they are mad you are suggesting that all media corrupts, and porn isn't some super special deeply influential thing compared to any other media consumption. You evil porn-normalizer!

1. it has everything to do with anything.
2. Litterally, the trans person who you answered to, only to undermine them.
3. Yes : "thus reinforcing the oppressor's bias against the minority."
4. "If trans porn is the only way these men are confronted to" i am not generalizing, I'm taking about the precise people who'll both hate trans people in public yet will happily jerk off to trans porn.

Once again, you choose not to understand what is right in front of your eyes, so you're either:

1)Straight american brainrotten male, 2)autistic and need precise scientific references to believe something (too bad your president has forbidden it). 3) Conservative and incapable of good faith.