▲ 433 ▼ Cyberattack on vehicle breathalyzer company leaves drivers stranded across the US (techcrunch.com) submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Treczoks@lemmy.world -7 points 7 months ago (6 children) Only those cars that needed a breathalyzer for reasons. Not much of a loss, I'd say. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago 2027 mandates every car have this. Its infuriating. permalink fedilink source parent [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (4 children) Per bidens Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, that's going to be every new car starting this year permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 13 points 7 months ago (2 children) Not sure how I didn't hear of this already. Apparently it's not necessarily a breathalyzer, but the proposals include a camera facing the driver to monitor them and passive monitoring of the air in the car. I don't drunk drive and barely even drink, but that's horrifying. I can't believe this went under the radar for me. More garbage that is going to break and cost thousands of dollars to fix in addition to all the violations of privacy. Cars are already advertising to people. Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? Why not invest in public transit? That's a great way to decrease impaired drivers of all stripes as well as help people in general. All this does is funnel more money into auto makers. I am so upset that this is the first I'm hearing of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Yeah I'd actually prefer a breathalyzer if they feel they need to do something permalink fedilink source parent [–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 7 months ago Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? There are already cameras inside most new cars, but the purpose is to see if you're nodding off when driving and such. It's a good thing to keep unsafe drivers off the road. The bad thing is the lack of privacy regulation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago Passive systems, not a breathalyzer. Still fucking stupid but one can disable the cameras or stop the vehicle from phoning home. They won't be able to disable your vehicle remotely and it appears to be more a while driving thing rather than a before driving thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago 2027 mandates every car have this. Its infuriating. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (4 children) Per bidens Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, that's going to be every new car starting this year permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 13 points 7 months ago (2 children) Not sure how I didn't hear of this already. Apparently it's not necessarily a breathalyzer, but the proposals include a camera facing the driver to monitor them and passive monitoring of the air in the car. I don't drunk drive and barely even drink, but that's horrifying. I can't believe this went under the radar for me. More garbage that is going to break and cost thousands of dollars to fix in addition to all the violations of privacy. Cars are already advertising to people. Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? Why not invest in public transit? That's a great way to decrease impaired drivers of all stripes as well as help people in general. All this does is funnel more money into auto makers. I am so upset that this is the first I'm hearing of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Yeah I'd actually prefer a breathalyzer if they feel they need to do something permalink fedilink source parent [–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 7 months ago Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? There are already cameras inside most new cars, but the purpose is to see if you're nodding off when driving and such. It's a good thing to keep unsafe drivers off the road. The bad thing is the lack of privacy regulation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago Passive systems, not a breathalyzer. Still fucking stupid but one can disable the cameras or stop the vehicle from phoning home. They won't be able to disable your vehicle remotely and it appears to be more a while driving thing rather than a before driving thing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 13 points 7 months ago (2 children) Not sure how I didn't hear of this already. Apparently it's not necessarily a breathalyzer, but the proposals include a camera facing the driver to monitor them and passive monitoring of the air in the car. I don't drunk drive and barely even drink, but that's horrifying. I can't believe this went under the radar for me. More garbage that is going to break and cost thousands of dollars to fix in addition to all the violations of privacy. Cars are already advertising to people. Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? Why not invest in public transit? That's a great way to decrease impaired drivers of all stripes as well as help people in general. All this does is funnel more money into auto makers. I am so upset that this is the first I'm hearing of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Yeah I'd actually prefer a breathalyzer if they feel they need to do something permalink fedilink source parent [–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 7 months ago Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? There are already cameras inside most new cars, but the purpose is to see if you're nodding off when driving and such. It's a good thing to keep unsafe drivers off the road. The bad thing is the lack of privacy regulation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 7 months ago Yeah I'd actually prefer a breathalyzer if they feel they need to do something permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kungen@feddit.nu 0 points 7 months ago Can you imagine if they put a camera inside the vehicle? There are already cameras inside most new cars, but the purpose is to see if you're nodding off when driving and such. It's a good thing to keep unsafe drivers off the road. The bad thing is the lack of privacy regulation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago Passive systems, not a breathalyzer. Still fucking stupid but one can disable the cameras or stop the vehicle from phoning home. They won't be able to disable your vehicle remotely and it appears to be more a while driving thing rather than a before driving thing. permalink fedilink source parent