Case was seen as major test of the first amendment and whether the US could use broad anti-terrorism statute to prosecute leftwing protesters

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 8 months ago (1 child)

All the charges against all of these folks seem to stem from this one act by one person:

One of the protesters was standing in the woods with an AR-15 and hit [a police officer] in the shoulder. The officer would survive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Sounds like they all arrived together. Why would one person of their group hide in the bushes with an AR-15. And shoot at a cop. In a country where accomplice liability is known to be fucked up, that's just not very bright.

  • source
  • parent