335
Anon beats his meat (slrpnk.net)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 8 months ago (8 children)

I think it just uses the canal that's already there if you don't opt for zero-depth. Not sure how functional the vagina is though, but iirc the penis functionality is usually preserved.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (7 children)

    Considering the extent of corpus spongiosum, part of the root of the penis, I don't see how you could shove it aside and put a hole and the vulva in there. Except if it's some kinda microvagina.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Two words: inguinal canal.

    Though that would still be awkward, as it would mean the new vagina’s off to the side instead of in the middle.

    Not saying it’s for sure how it’s done (I have no idea on that), just that I think that’s the “canal” OP is referencing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Do the balls just gone on either side of that then? Or do they push it out of the way?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Not sure what kind of anatomy you have where the balls are in the pathway of the dick.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Just normal anatomy. Just frequently put the balls into their storage space above.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •