you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -1 points 8 months ago (20 children)

Tankie takeover? I always thought that the whole point of the anarchy instance was to try to pick up all people Russian-Chinese propaganda disguised under communist rhetoric couldn't. It's basically a charismatic facewash that falls back to the last wildcard of just trying to generically shit on governments because "they work against the people - but also, let's create all the systems governments represent while just applying the stroke of its for the people somewhere". In other words, it's the communist mantra except rather than identifying itself as communism it just focuses on identifying governments bad while trying to promote governance but with some mental gymnastic spin.

Not sure the whole lemmy-derived fediverse hasn't been irrevocably tainted by these cult-forming/alt-bot factory communities. You can find instances that defederate from these, the problem is you immediately get a dissected part of the community because they are the baseline founding communities and the resulting conversations have discourse hidden from you that they don't and can freely attempt to manipulate.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    because they are the baseline founding communities and the resulting conversations have discourse hidden from you that they don’t and can freely attempt to manipulate.

    .ml doesn't have the most active communities since a few years

    !asklemmy@lemmy.world is much more active than !asklemmy@lemmy.ml , !fediverse@lemmy.world is much more active than !fediverse@lemmy.ml

    For the few remaining, there are usually alternatives, e.g. !privacy@lemmy.ml , but !privacy@programming.dev is a valid alternative

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    The current system is flawed. This system will always carry its foundational weaknesses. Your counterexamples are examples of the dissection you have to force, never mind that it does not address the problem at the user level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Nobody had to force !asklemmy@lemmy.world to overcome !asklemmy@lemmy.ml , it just happened organically as LW grew its userbase

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Could they remain in !asklemmy@lemmy.ml and continue to participate in !asklemmy@lemmy.world? If not, then they had to force themselves to begin posting and commenting elsewhere. For casual users, it is organic because they just go to the Active listings, but the dissection is still there. Hunting for minutiae like this and how you can redefine things into other things does not address the elephant in the room.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah, lemmy is well and truly dead. you need diversity for a platform to grow and Lemmy doesn't have that since all the "bad diversity" has been removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    I don't see it that way, but I do see users coming into it and having to face lower quality arguments without nuance along with trolling or having to face low interaction rates, or ridiculous beehive charades of argument chains too surreal to seem real, and just choosing to go back to the mainstream platforms instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    having to face lower quality arguments without nuance along with trolling or having to face low interaction rates, or ridiculous beehive charades of argument chains too surreal to seem real,

    Yep. And at times, that and worse from mods.

    As per the

    all the “bad diversity” has been removed

    effect.

    Gate-keeping. Groupthink of the mods.

    Though, lets remember, this is still the fediverse. It's not a monolith where the mods are the mods. Mods some communities are worse, some are better, and we can always start our own communities and host our own instances.

    Robust enough against lemmy being "dead", like @goat@sh.itjust.works said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Jesus is that what's happening? I'm not strictly a communist or anarchist (tho I consider them my allies) but maybe that's because the ones I've encountered are upfront and honest about who they are and what they believe instead of trying to obfuscate it lol Aside from outright trolling, what is even the point of acting this way? I genuinely don't get it from any perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (5 children)

    Anarchist are just tankies who don't like the term. Kinda like conservatives who say they're libertarians. They're just magas with hammer and sickles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Most anarchists who are serious are far from tankies. In fact, in my experience, I clash with anarchists because I feel they're too idealistic and unwilling to use repression on any negative element of society.

    There are anarchists who converge with tankies, but generally those are the terminally online sorts who are lonely and seeking a sense of community, rather than committed ideologues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago

    Or democratic socialists that like to pretend they're anti-electoral, while still saying pro-Western crap without some modicum of criticism (also though the tankies need their criticism too since often tankies devolves into fascist-adjacent or fascist governments, like China with their genocides and capitalism).

    The first world left doesn't exist, it's so overly splintered with people threatening each other in knife fights over silly differences, with the spectre of western and eastern propaganda spitroasting first worlders' minds. We need someone influential in some form to lead everyone that isn't going to be Napoleon/Stalin 2.0, but that sounds like it's against conventional Marxist thought, but I don't have any better ideas.

  • source
  • parent