▲ 140 ▼ Protestation (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by protestation@discuss.tchncs.de [B] to c/communism@lemmy.ml 64 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (29 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source hideshow 29 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Shitlibs have been reduced to squawking out off topic, sentence fragment, thought terminating cliches. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (26 children) Is your point that China, Russia (both Socialist during the USSR and Capitalist during the Russian Federation), and Iran are all generally evils that must be opposed? What's your point, exactly, are you denying class analysis? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 26 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -10 points 1 year ago (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (23 children) The US and EU are also authoritarian and consequently have a history of doing bad shit to people as well, even currently as both are actively supporting the genocide of Palestine in order to protect their Imperialist super-profits. I think your point is very under-developed, you grabbed some talking points out of a bag and rolled them out on the table without giving any of them support, context, or applying them to a further analysis. Taken critically, your point is just "Russia/China/Iran bad because they are Russia/China/Iran," not a systemic critique. What the world needs is certainly Communism, eventually, but the way to get there is through Socialism, as found in the PRC, Cuba, etc. The regulated Capitalism of the EU runs on Imperialism, just like the US. The EU super-exploits the Global South through unequal exchange, perpetuating the underdevelopment of countries in Africa and South America in order to support vast systems of plunder. The EU is a problem, not a solution, one that needs Socialism and greater industrialization so as to not be reliant on plunder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (22 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Pili@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago Hey EU citizen here. Our governments are absolutely authoritarian and we are very much being oppressed. We strike all the time to try to get the government to give us some crumbs, but not only do they refuse to listen, they also send the police in armoured gear to beat us up. This is not the model you want in the USA, believe me. Maybe they present it to you in your media as some kind of paradise but that's very far from the truth, they probably say that to lead you away from a real revolution that would be disastrous for your oligarchy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] folaht@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) 1989 Tianenmen Square massacre insurrection The equivalent of this would be 1000 US caucasian student communists showing up on Freedom Plaza, demanding that Confucious Institutes be reopened while building statues of "Chairman Háu!", and singing how oppressed they are if those institutes are not build for them, then do a Trump style insurrection and continue to kill when US troops arrive, which not even the Jan 6 insurrectionists dared to do, because the government, instead of sending armed soldiers, send in their army choir to calm everyone down and have them peacefully removed from "the plaza". Instigators had been shot dead. And dozens of innocent people died in a state of confusion in the outskirts of the city, with protesters not believing the insurrection happened and soldiers demanding confescation of public transport to get to the square to prevent a potential coup from happening. Then, when all is said and done, China starts calling the Jan 6 insurrection, the Freedom Plaza massacre, despite all the action having taking place at either Capitol Hill or JFK airport. Soviet gulags Holdover from their imperial days, increased in use during world war I and II prisoners, then got dismantled to a few until the last one closed down in 1987. That's at least 38 years before the US, as the US still has forced slave labor camps all over the nation. Russian war on Ukraine Ukraine is an artificial state created by Russia from its own territory and Polish territory. Kiev being Russia's first capital like Philidelphia was to the US. A coup happened in Ukraine and Oblasts (states) wanted to secede because they didn't recognize Poroshenko as their president since they declared themselves as Russian and demanded referendum, that was violently blocked with lethal gunfire killing voters at the polling stations. In response the seperatists declared secession and asked Russia for help. Russia demanded Ukraine to hold a cease fire so a referendum could be held. And after 8 years of Ukrainian presidents, including Zelensky who platformed on the promise that he was going to be THE president that would bring cease fire and being elected on the basis of that promise, after 8 years of only increasing the suppression, Russia did a small invasion to tell Zelensky that they would really appreciate a cease fire there and promise that it would never join NATO. Zelensky agreed, but then Boris Johnson showed up the next day saying that the US and EU have got all their weapons ready to arm Ukraine with whatever he wanted that the EU has, so he would fight with all the weapons of all of Europe, excluding Russia and whatever the US was willing to give, basically turning it into a world war and Zelensky agreed. So basically a semi-world-war has been started by the US/UK, because they refuse a small portion of a half-Russian nation to hold a referendum so that they could leave, because they thought a coup was undemocratic and didn't like an oppressive anti-Russian regime change when they themselves are Russian and viewed as Russians, not just by themselves. Iran is quite lacking on human rights too. Iran has had countless of attempts by the US/UK to recoup the country after a pro-sovereignty countercoup ended the rule of the Shah. All "human rights violations" are simply retaliations against deadly attacks by paid protesters, and CIA-astroturfed bestseller authors. Meanwhile the US is deploying the military because people protested against police raids that deports legal immigrants out of the country and before that protests against their regime deeply supporting a genocide. These reactions and types of protests are incomparable. And you can see how incomparable they are when you just look at the protest chants and media pictures taken. Hong Kong protests for example came out of nowhere, used the flimsiest excuse to overthrow the government, with false claims and demands that far exceeded the Jan 6 insurrection claims and demands and just happened to be hyperorganized with its leaders constantly flying to the US to pick up awards. Imagine US protest leaders flying to China to pick up human rights awards for protesting... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Shitlibs have been reduced to squawking out off topic, sentence fragment, thought terminating cliches. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (26 children) Is your point that China, Russia (both Socialist during the USSR and Capitalist during the Russian Federation), and Iran are all generally evils that must be opposed? What's your point, exactly, are you denying class analysis? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 26 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -10 points 1 year ago (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (23 children) The US and EU are also authoritarian and consequently have a history of doing bad shit to people as well, even currently as both are actively supporting the genocide of Palestine in order to protect their Imperialist super-profits. I think your point is very under-developed, you grabbed some talking points out of a bag and rolled them out on the table without giving any of them support, context, or applying them to a further analysis. Taken critically, your point is just "Russia/China/Iran bad because they are Russia/China/Iran," not a systemic critique. What the world needs is certainly Communism, eventually, but the way to get there is through Socialism, as found in the PRC, Cuba, etc. The regulated Capitalism of the EU runs on Imperialism, just like the US. The EU super-exploits the Global South through unequal exchange, perpetuating the underdevelopment of countries in Africa and South America in order to support vast systems of plunder. The EU is a problem, not a solution, one that needs Socialism and greater industrialization so as to not be reliant on plunder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (22 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Pili@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago Hey EU citizen here. Our governments are absolutely authoritarian and we are very much being oppressed. We strike all the time to try to get the government to give us some crumbs, but not only do they refuse to listen, they also send the police in armoured gear to beat us up. This is not the model you want in the USA, believe me. Maybe they present it to you in your media as some kind of paradise but that's very far from the truth, they probably say that to lead you away from a real revolution that would be disastrous for your oligarchy. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -10 points 1 year ago (25 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 25 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (23 children) The US and EU are also authoritarian and consequently have a history of doing bad shit to people as well, even currently as both are actively supporting the genocide of Palestine in order to protect their Imperialist super-profits. I think your point is very under-developed, you grabbed some talking points out of a bag and rolled them out on the table without giving any of them support, context, or applying them to a further analysis. Taken critically, your point is just "Russia/China/Iran bad because they are Russia/China/Iran," not a systemic critique. What the world needs is certainly Communism, eventually, but the way to get there is through Socialism, as found in the PRC, Cuba, etc. The regulated Capitalism of the EU runs on Imperialism, just like the US. The EU super-exploits the Global South through unequal exchange, perpetuating the underdevelopment of countries in Africa and South America in order to support vast systems of plunder. The EU is a problem, not a solution, one that needs Socialism and greater industrialization so as to not be reliant on plunder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (22 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies) [–] Pili@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago Hey EU citizen here. Our governments are absolutely authoritarian and we are very much being oppressed. We strike all the time to try to get the government to give us some crumbs, but not only do they refuse to listen, they also send the police in armoured gear to beat us up. This is not the model you want in the USA, believe me. Maybe they present it to you in your media as some kind of paradise but that's very far from the truth, they probably say that to lead you away from a real revolution that would be disastrous for your oligarchy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (23 children) The US and EU are also authoritarian and consequently have a history of doing bad shit to people as well, even currently as both are actively supporting the genocide of Palestine in order to protect their Imperialist super-profits. I think your point is very under-developed, you grabbed some talking points out of a bag and rolled them out on the table without giving any of them support, context, or applying them to a further analysis. Taken critically, your point is just "Russia/China/Iran bad because they are Russia/China/Iran," not a systemic critique. What the world needs is certainly Communism, eventually, but the way to get there is through Socialism, as found in the PRC, Cuba, etc. The regulated Capitalism of the EU runs on Imperialism, just like the US. The EU super-exploits the Global South through unequal exchange, perpetuating the underdevelopment of countries in Africa and South America in order to support vast systems of plunder. The EU is a problem, not a solution, one that needs Socialism and greater industrialization so as to not be reliant on plunder. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 23 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (22 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (22 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 22 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* I don’t think you know what authoritarianism is I think we do know what you think it is: “horseshoe theory”; Arendtian “totalitarianism.” https://lemmy.ml/comment/17774014 the idea of paying a scientist of any kind the same as a cashier at a gas station is ridiculous. This isn’t even a straw man; it’s an allusion to an unstated straw man. No one is suggesting that everyone should be paid the same, and AFAIK no socialist state has ever done it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (20 children) I think that's a poor counter to my argument, I do know what authoritarianism is. All states are authoritarian, all are instruments by which the ruling class oppresses the other classes. In the US and EU, those are the Bourgeoisie, specifically the Monopolist Imperialist bourgeoisie. In Russia, the ruling class are the Nationalist bourgeoisie, in the PRC the ruling class is the Proletariat, as it was in the USSR as well. Each ruling class uses the power of the state, the power of authority, to cement itself, and displays greater use of force the more that status is called into question. The way to move beyond authoritarianism is to move beyond class society. The way to move beyond class society is through Socialism, by which all property can be sublimated into common ownership and direction, to fulfill use rather than need. This is the path to Communism. Countries like the PRC that are already Socialist exert their authority to enforce the interests of the Proletariat, and thus their use of authority is more progressive than the US and EU, who use their authority as Imperialists to keep the system by which the West plunders and brutalizes the world for profit to keep going. Russia and Iran play the role of self-interested nationalists working against the Imperialists, just as the small business owners, ie petite bourgeoisie, can side with the Proletariat out of their own self-interest in revolution. They are certainly not world leaders of Socialism by any stretch of the imagination, but work with Socialist countries as they have no other option than surrender to Western Imperialism and be decimated like Russia was following the dissolution of the USSR before the Nationalists kicked out the West. Your last point about equal pay for a scientist and a cashier is a non-sequitor, Marxists are not equalitarians. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (-1 replies)
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (20 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 20 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (19 children) Incredible comeback, Marxism has been destroyed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago* (18 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago* (17 children) More non-sequitors, I guess? You didn't "dissent," you just called me stupid. You didn't even have productive criticism attached to your comment, it was a low-effort insult and thus broke the rules. Your other comments are still up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (16 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (15 children) Communists and Socialists have faced struggles with color revolutions and counterrevolutions, and have met those struggles with force, yes. However, it's worth engaging with what the counter revolutionaries wanted. Well, they succeeded in the 1990s with the dissolution of the USSR, and what happened next was a collapse in life expectancy and 7 million excess deaths. Dissent is allowed in Socialist countries, what isn't allowed is the Bourgeoisie acting freely and inciting violence against the people. Further, your comment was hardly "dissent," it was you insulting me without engaging with the arguments. It's toothless. It's unfortunate that you don't live up to your username, fascism and anticommunism are twins. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago Who woulda guessed the liberal anticommunist turned out to be toothless when it comes to opposing genuine fascism? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago The riots surrounding Tian'anmen Square resulted in hundreds of deaths of protestors and PLA officers alike, it wasn't a rampant slaughter but the suppression of a western-backed color revolution. The student leaders admitted to inciting violence in order to provoke a violent response, hopefully triggering more widespread revolt in their eyes, but fled the scene to other countries like the US before the PLA was sent in. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (5 children) They did not "break free." 7 million people died, life expectancy plumeted, social safety nets were destroyed, poverty skyrocketed, sex trafficking skyrocketed, and the large majority of people who lived in the Soviet Union prefer it over modern Capitalism. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) You didn't have logic. You said they were "freed from oppression," by which I can only assume you mean the freedom to starve and die as wealth inequality skyrocketed and the former Socialist state was plundered. The majority of people who lived in the USSR want it back, and this is well-documented. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago Why do anti-communists like you always act like this? No arguments, just deliberate bad faith evasions? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago What on Earth are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -6 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children) Communism is democratic. Liberalism, which you are likely referring to, is tied to fascism. Fascism is liberalism when the conditions of society necessitate the bourgeoisie's use of unrestrained violence to prevent changes to the status quo. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] FuckFascism@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago There are several Socialist countries run by Communist parties, generally all of them are democratic. They have different models of democracy from liberalism, ones that are usually far more comprehensive. You should do some more research and try to actually understand the concepts you are arguing about, every time you're proven mistaken you ignore it and find a new talking point. It's better to hold your tongue and read up more than it is to waste your own time talking about that which you don't know nor understand. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pili@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago Hey EU citizen here. Our governments are absolutely authoritarian and we are very much being oppressed. We strike all the time to try to get the government to give us some crumbs, but not only do they refuse to listen, they also send the police in armoured gear to beat us up. This is not the model you want in the USA, believe me. Maybe they present it to you in your media as some kind of paradise but that's very far from the truth, they probably say that to lead you away from a real revolution that would be disastrous for your oligarchy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) 1989 Tianenmen Square massacre insurrection The equivalent of this would be 1000 US caucasian student communists showing up on Freedom Plaza, demanding that Confucious Institutes be reopened while building statues of "Chairman Háu!", and singing how oppressed they are if those institutes are not build for them, then do a Trump style insurrection and continue to kill when US troops arrive, which not even the Jan 6 insurrectionists dared to do, because the government, instead of sending armed soldiers, send in their army choir to calm everyone down and have them peacefully removed from "the plaza". Instigators had been shot dead. And dozens of innocent people died in a state of confusion in the outskirts of the city, with protesters not believing the insurrection happened and soldiers demanding confescation of public transport to get to the square to prevent a potential coup from happening. Then, when all is said and done, China starts calling the Jan 6 insurrection, the Freedom Plaza massacre, despite all the action having taking place at either Capitol Hill or JFK airport. Soviet gulags Holdover from their imperial days, increased in use during world war I and II prisoners, then got dismantled to a few until the last one closed down in 1987. That's at least 38 years before the US, as the US still has forced slave labor camps all over the nation. Russian war on Ukraine Ukraine is an artificial state created by Russia from its own territory and Polish territory. Kiev being Russia's first capital like Philidelphia was to the US. A coup happened in Ukraine and Oblasts (states) wanted to secede because they didn't recognize Poroshenko as their president since they declared themselves as Russian and demanded referendum, that was violently blocked with lethal gunfire killing voters at the polling stations. In response the seperatists declared secession and asked Russia for help. Russia demanded Ukraine to hold a cease fire so a referendum could be held. And after 8 years of Ukrainian presidents, including Zelensky who platformed on the promise that he was going to be THE president that would bring cease fire and being elected on the basis of that promise, after 8 years of only increasing the suppression, Russia did a small invasion to tell Zelensky that they would really appreciate a cease fire there and promise that it would never join NATO. Zelensky agreed, but then Boris Johnson showed up the next day saying that the US and EU have got all their weapons ready to arm Ukraine with whatever he wanted that the EU has, so he would fight with all the weapons of all of Europe, excluding Russia and whatever the US was willing to give, basically turning it into a world war and Zelensky agreed. So basically a semi-world-war has been started by the US/UK, because they refuse a small portion of a half-Russian nation to hold a referendum so that they could leave, because they thought a coup was undemocratic and didn't like an oppressive anti-Russian regime change when they themselves are Russian and viewed as Russians, not just by themselves. Iran is quite lacking on human rights too. Iran has had countless of attempts by the US/UK to recoup the country after a pro-sovereignty countercoup ended the rule of the Shah. All "human rights violations" are simply retaliations against deadly attacks by paid protesters, and CIA-astroturfed bestseller authors. Meanwhile the US is deploying the military because people protested against police raids that deports legal immigrants out of the country and before that protests against their regime deeply supporting a genocide. These reactions and types of protests are incomparable. And you can see how incomparable they are when you just look at the protest chants and media pictures taken. Hong Kong protests for example came out of nowhere, used the flimsiest excuse to overthrow the government, with false claims and demands that far exceeded the Jan 6 insurrection claims and demands and just happened to be hyperorganized with its leaders constantly flying to the US to pick up awards. Imagine US protest leaders flying to China to pick up human rights awards for protesting... permalink fedilink source parent