you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 70 points 8 months ago (11 children)

Nudity alone - without the intent to shock or arouse - shouldn't be taboo, criminal, or censored.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Disagree. Underpants are a minimum for public transport and seating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    Towel. The etiquette when visiting a clothing-optional setting is to bring a towel to sit on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm with you on paper, but couldn't deal with a naked crowded subway car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I mean I'm sure you could deal with one or two people. And if there's 50, then you have become the weird one and I guess you have to suck it up. As it were.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh, sorry, I was imagining EVERYBODY naked and a really crowded train. I see why that's dumb now, but it's more entertaining to imagine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    "There should be mandatory nudity in public" is a pretty controversial opinion. But you got me on board. Lets do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I don’t fundamentally disagree with the principle, but it’s easier to police malignant behavior if nudity is confined to limited social spaces (eg. beaches, gyms, saunas, ect…)

    Otherwise you give creepos the ability to ruin random public spaces randomly with very little enforcement potential - but I guess it depends on what of the two restricted scenarios is the lesser evil.

    I am somewhat ambivalent FWIW

  • source
  • parent