Well would you look at that, you managed to take the one thing in my first statement that you could dispute and turn it into a set of paragraphs while completely ignoring the rest of my point.

You even managed to turn me saying "A considerable number of deaths" into the strawman of "a significant portion of total deaths"

Which is A: not what I said

B: Completely missing the point

C: Failing to do any research outside of the VERY softball sources I sent you, because I knew you wouldn't react well to being told that you've been lied to about these "dangerous hamas terrorists" and how israel is entirely justified in genociding them because they attacked back against the settlers.

This was Palestine before the colonization push started and before the first Nakba

And this is what remains of that tiny segment of land left over in the South West coast, known as Gaza.

I'd like for you to gain a little empathy, instead of trying to make some form of "both sides bad" argument that only justifies israel in continuing to break any form of 'ceasefire' by letting them point at a building and say "hamas is there" before artillery or airstrikes get called in.

You know. Like they did with the hospitals. And the universities.