you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 53 points 8 months ago (8 children)

A judge delayed the hearing to later next month and agreed with her attorney, Emily Howe, to specify the woman does not have to appear in person — a relief as they worried immigration officers would be waiting at the courthouse to take her away.

Why aren’t more judges doing this?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Under current conditions, because apparently there is nothing governing keeping these terrorists out of the courthouses waiting to black bag people who are following the process, you'd think they would ALL do this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Because they claim the judge is interfering with their job, and the judge is arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Lol wut?

    Has there been one instance of this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    You understand there are some very obvious fundamental differences between these cases right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Not really. The point is, if a judge assists a person that ICE wants, ICE will arrest the judge, and here is proof of it. ICE isn't concerned with nuance, details aren't important, there are no protocols, they just do whatever they want in any situation. So whatever differences that may exist between the cases are irrelevant, ICE will arrest a judge if they feel like it, no matter what the details are.

  • source
  • parent