Kacarott comments on Just so there's no confusion

Funny

16,692 readers

4,092 active

308 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

Not if we are specifically asking about whether the chicken or the chicken egg came first (which is what the original comment in this chain implied), because if proto-chickens lay proto-chicken eggs and a chicken was hatched out of one, then the chicken came before the chicken egg

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

Sure but that's changing the question, the original question is "which came first, the chicken or the egg" not "the chicken or the chicken egg" so the answer to the question, as posed, is definitely: the egg

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

??? You yourself said "even if we are talking about chicken eggs, it is still the egg first" and I was making a point against that.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Kraiden@piefed.social 2 points 8 months ago

hey, look! a distraction!

permalink

fedilink

source

parent