this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026

285 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,627 readers

13,793 active

3,105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

English Wikipedia bans archive.today (en.wikipedia.org)

submitted 8 months ago by onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

No.

They think that relying on a hostile archive will ultimately harm Wikipedia.

They know the shortcomings of the other options.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

i’ve not used the others are they not as good?

i’ll be trying them soon

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not that they aren't as good, necessarily.

More that the others do less "grey-hat" stuff, and therefore are less likely to cause harm or alter the content they host.

parent