you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So they think archive.today can be replaced with:

Replace the archive link so it points to a different archive with a copy of the source, such as the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive (https://web.archive.org/), Ghostarchive (https://ghostarchive.org/) or Megalodon (https://megalodon.jp/).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    No.

    They think that relying on a hostile archive will ultimately harm Wikipedia.

    They know the shortcomings of the other options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments