18
Why is there a limit to zooming in on a picture? (piefed.social)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/summit@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Basically the title.

Do pictures really need a limit to how far you can zoom?

It annoys me to no end when there's a larger image that I'd really like to zoom in to view a detail and I run into an arbitrary wall just too far away.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 8 months ago (10 children)

I think this feature request can be summarized as: add a setting to allow users to adjust the max zoom in the image viewer.

To answer your question about why there even is a max zoom. I use the app a lot with one hand. When I do this I double tap to zoom once, double tap again to zoom twice, then double tap to return to 1x zoom and then I can swipe the image away to go back. This series of gestures is what feels most natural to me. Without a max zoom, I'd have to do an edge swipe or a double tap + hold + drag. Not impossible just slightly less natural.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    I don't see why double tap zooming and manual zooming should be connected.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (8 children)

    Well a double tap zoom is a manual zoom, just by a specific amount.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Sure. I only used the word to distinguish the difference. Maybe "analogue zoom" would've been better.

    Analogue zooming shouldn't need to be connected with double tap zoom's amounts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (6 children)

    They do because you can pinch to zoom then double tap to zoom or vice versa. To disable one if the other is done first woild result in a confusing experience.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 4 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    I don't mean the other should be disabled. Just that the amount zoomed with the tap should not have anything to do with the amount you've zoomed, or how much you can zoom, with pinching.
    If you have pinched, of course you can tap to the next zoom or back to original if you are maxed. Or if you've tapped, sure you can continue by pinching.

    I don't understand why the amounts are connected.

    All I want is that the maximum amount zoomed by pinching is removed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

    The logic for double tap to zoom is:

    If the current zoom is max, then set zoom to 1x otherwise increase zoom by some factor.

    For the sake of argument if the max zoom level is 1000x and it increases by 2 each time then it will take 500 double taps before you get back to 1x zoom.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 8 months ago* (3 children)

    I see.

    Could the tap zoom max be set to a lower count than pinching so that it takes 2 (or what it is now) double taps to get to the max (say 3x), but you can continue zooming from there by pinching.

    If you double tap when the zoom is anything past 3x it goes to 1x.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    All of this is a non-issue since the plan is just to make max zoom a setting. It's going to stay the way it is by default but if you want no limit you will be able to set that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •