942
Avocado toast is out. Rotisserie chicken is in. (discuss.online)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
260 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://xcancel.com/BoringBiz_/status/2021930685368254749

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (9 children)

I did, but you're being a typical lemmy troll who refuses to acknowledge any counter point to your simplified narrative that lacks any context because you want to bite the ragebait that makes you feel morally superior for doing so.

the article is designed to make you upset and troll you by going at your bias that premade grocery store chickens are some sort of nutritional necessity that is liberating people from the doldrums of their suffering at the evils of capitalism... even though it the chickens being sold like this is really an evil of capitalism itself.

you can't have your pre-made chicken rage and eat it too!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    I did, but you’re being a typical lemmy troll who refuses to acknowledge any counter point to your simplified narrative that lacks any

    In fairness, like the troll you accuse everyone else of being, you have zero proof for your claim that these chickens have somehow been modified to be shittier for you, and that's why they're cheaper.

    it’s just that whole foods and other groceries normalized the concept of hot ready to eat meals being served in grocery stores. that was never a thing 20+ years ago.

    Sorry you apparently grew up in bumfuck nowhere, pal. The Hannafords in the sticks that I worked at in high school, more than 20 years ago, had plenty of rotisserie chickens, and had them long before I started working there.

    You've gone and invented a massive conspiracy that ignores a simple reality. Offering rotisserie chickens as a loss leader is a simple and effective way to a) move whole chickens with minor blemishes and b) get people in the store with the promise of a cheap bird that almost always required you head to the back of the store, where they could count on you seeing several things "I may as well get while I'm here" to make up for whatever loss they sell the rotisserie chickens here.

    I've worked in several major grocery stores in different regions, and never encountered any evidence of this nonsense you're so indignant people won't swallow wholeheartedly.

    tl;dr: Show some proof or shut the fuck up, you muppet. Your own screeds do not count as proof, let's see some external links.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    whatever proof i gave you you'd deny. you can google it. these chickens are overwhelmingly prepared with injections of salt, fat and butter and plenty of outlets have tested them and they have massive levels of sodium, saturated fat, and other stuff like preservatives and chemicals that makes them processed if not ultra processed foods.

    it's not a conspiracy, it's how our food supply works.

    Hannafords is small chain, we're talking about Costco and Walmart in this thread. Perhaps their chickens are better. I have been to a few of them in my area and they are an expensive store with more premium products. Whole foods has them too and theirs aren't cheap and are probably more natural.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Hannafords is small chain,

    Ah, yes, a tiny, insignificant chain, only backed by the supply chain of its parent company which is one of the largest food retailers in the entire US with it's various regional rebadges of subsidiaries.

    Operating more than 2,000 stores of multiple brands across 23 states, Ahold Delhaize is among the largest food and consumables retailers in the United States via its regional subsidiaries.

    You're talking out of your ass and you know it, while grasping at straws and completely ignoring the fact that criticism in the OP is not that they are spending money on something people like you consider a luxury, but they're framing it as a splurge to purchase a whole chicken at the lowest cost available in most stores for an entire chicken.

    You really had the obvious option available to complain about this whole time, if you wanted to talk about people in debt splurging on a luxury, you could have just bitched and moaned about them springing for the probiotic juices mentioned in the OP. Instead, you're here arguing against a point nobody is making about the quality of the chicken because you've got a bug up your ass that someone else might eat a chicken you disapprove of.

    Go get a hobby.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    No, I'm talking out of a personal interest in economics and the food supply. You are just the one talking our your ass and thinking your personal chicken prep experience from 10-20 years ago is relevant to the market today.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Again, you have restated the same thing over and over again without proof, while not just myself, but multiple people from at least two countries, working for different major companies have told you that this was not the case where they worked. If there really is this massive conspiracy of yours to specifically inject chickens destined for the rotisserie (as opposed to just all of them, since plenty of cheaper chicken gets injected with brine and other chemicals at the processing plant, so that whole, raw chicken that you're on your high horse about being so much better often is no better or worse in this regard), then post your proof already. If you're just going to keep on moaning, "But it's true, you're all just too stupid and emotional to admit it," then kindly shut up and save us all time. You post it again, I'm going to ask you for proof of your claims another time.

    You can't even be bothered to know the most basic outlines of corporate retail supply chains, or else you wouldn't be saying such stupid things like Hannaford is too small a chain to be a valid comparison, when they've been owned and backed entirely by one of the largest grocery multinationals going and used their supply chain for around two decades at this point. Given that level of ignorance on the topic, I really doubt your insights into food and grocery supply chains are even worth the electricity you're consuming to transmit them to the server when you post them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    no, what I'm asking is how a ready to eat food product that is cheaper than the raw materials alternative is considered a luxury in this context

    I understand that ready to eat food itself is somewhat of a luxury, but that is not what is being discussed - what is being discussed is the cost of the food.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    is fast food a luxury or a necessity?

    this is a version of fast food. that's why it's a luxury.

    it's also a factor of true cost vs the fact these are sold at a loss and understanding the psychology therein that gets people to buy more than they otherwise would.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago

    no, what I'm asking is how a ready to eat food product that is cheaper than the raw materials alternative is considered a luxury in this context

    I understand that ready to eat food itself is somewhat of a luxury, but that is not what is being discussed - what is being discussed is the cost of the food.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent