Again, you have restated the same thing over and over again without proof, while not just myself, but multiple people from at least two countries, working for different major companies have told you that this was not the case where they worked. If there really is this massive conspiracy of yours to specifically inject chickens destined for the rotisserie (as opposed to just all of them, since plenty of cheaper chicken gets injected with brine and other chemicals at the processing plant, so that whole, raw chicken that you're on your high horse about being so much better often is no better or worse in this regard), then post your proof already. If you're just going to keep on moaning, "But it's true, you're all just too stupid and emotional to admit it," then kindly shut up and save us all time. You post it again, I'm going to ask you for proof of your claims another time.

You can't even be bothered to know the most basic outlines of corporate retail supply chains, or else you wouldn't be saying such stupid things like Hannaford is too small a chain to be a valid comparison, when they've been owned and backed entirely by one of the largest grocery multinationals going and used their supply chain for around two decades at this point. Given that level of ignorance on the topic, I really doubt your insights into food and grocery supply chains are even worth the electricity you're consuming to transmit them to the server when you post them.