you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 8 months ago (6 children)

clearly, especially since it's rhetorically convenient for you

an animal with a nervous system entirely analogous to ours and a plant that has crackly bubbles in its cells when it's low on water or damaged? the same thing, actually. identical. there is no difference between things, and if you think there are then clearly you're just a hypocritical vegan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure what you mean by "crackly bubbles". Many plants (possibly most of them) use electrochemical signaling, which at the very least resembles the hormonal system in animals. The simplest animals are definitely less complex, neural processing wise, than the most complex plants -- consider for example sponges (literally no nervous system of any kind) vs. the venus flytrap (capable of rudimentary counting; the trap only closes when the hairs are triggered a certain number of times within a certain timeframe).

    There's also tons of animals whose nervous systems aren't at all similar to that of humans. Insects and arthropods for example don't really have a brain, just lumps of ganglia that do some rudimentary processing, and unsurprisingly most people don't really consider insects to be capable of having any kind of meaningful sentient internal experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    I mean not necessarily hypocritical or even wrong. Just possibly irreflexive or vain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments