Nonsensical reply, but since you obviously don't understand, I'll explain:

"Temporarily embarrassed non-millionaire" is a complete straw man. No one being labeled that way actually has the mindset of 'I expect to be that wealthy one day, so I'm going to oppose this in my own future self-interest'. People just like to pretend they do because it makes it easier to dismiss their opposition when you characterize it as nothing more than foolish selfishness.

It's intellectually equivalent to people who think 'reptilians' are controlling everything in the government. Yeah, that "explains so much", too, because you can attribute anything to that. No evidence it's actually the case, though.

Additionally, when someone says, for example:

squeezing more taxes out of the ultra-wealthy isn't going to make any difference until we change how wasteful the spending of tax dollars is, we already take in enough taxes to do everything we want, look, our average government spending per person on healthcare is the highest in the world, yet our coverage and outcomes are outdone by several other countries, no excuse for that

people like you and someguy3, in my experience, just respond with an accusation of bootlicking, because it's the intellectually-cowardly, easy response, compared to actually addressing the argument.