you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

"A two-thirds majority vote in the Senate is required to convict and remove the official."

I see the problem. 20 republican senators are not switching sides.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago

    That's not specifically for taking bribes, though. That could be for literally anything including things that aren't crimes or aren't forbidden in the constitution. It's a political action, not a legal one.

    Something more concrete would be if, during the Biden presidency, Congress passed a law saying that any foreign gift to a federal official including the president goes into a trust or is forcibly confiscated by the federal government and/or sold off to pay the country's debt or something like that. They did basically nothing instead, even knowing that they'd never get that much of a majority in the Senate to actually remove a president for violating the constitution or that hypothetical new law. So there's effectively no actual rule against emoluments despite what that piece of paper says.

  • source
  • parent