you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago (5 children)

Really living up to that republican brain. Please read again what I asked.

please do a breakdown of your rule and explain how you get severity instead of bias.

Seems I need to spell it out what that means. This entire comment tree is about whether the title of your post makes sense or not. I'm claiming it doesn't make sense because if you apply it objectively to all the presidential candidates it makes it very easy to dismiss a candidate because only questioning is enough to consider someone unfit. You're arguing it makes sense because of "severity". You do not use that word in your title and I don't see a single instance of anything indicating anything about "severity". For your argument to make any sense you need to explain how severity is derived from your title. If you add severity after the fact then that just proves the original title didn't make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    Sorry, its obvious to me you dont understand context or how language is used. Its a two sentence title, not a thesis. Please, figure your shit out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    At this point I don't even understand what the fuck you're saying? Are you saying I can make false statements as long as they're two sentences or less? So I can call you a pedo and that's completely fine because it's a single sentence not a thesis?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments