you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago* (10 children)

If i give someone my bank details and passwords and they empty my account, can I claim I've been hacked?

No.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago (6 children)

    What part of "unauthorized access" is so difficult for people to understand?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (5 children)

    How is authorization determined?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (4 children)

    Probably by giving out your account details.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (3 children)

    So, Epstein has given out his account details by putting them in an email.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Were those details only used by the people he directly sent them to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (1 child)

    Can dead men either provide or deny authorisation?

    Can dead men get hacked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    When I die, my assets should go to the people I named as my beneficiaries. If someone else comes along to try and take ownership of my assets, they should definitely be denied. Also, just because I'm dead doesn't mean anyone should have access to my devices, especially if password locked. So I would answer both questions with yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    You violated the TOS by sharing the details

    A TOS violation is not the same as breaking the law. If that were the case then every single person on the face on the planet would be a criminal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    The account holder violated the contract with the serviceprovider. The "hacker" has no agreement with anyone so they violated nothing. They found a key on the ground and used it in a lock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)
  • Yeah. It comes down to Freedom to roam in Northern Europe and squatters rights in the extreme physical parallel. Entering is fine as long as there is no breaking.

    In the digital relm i would argue that brute forcing a password is like jimmying a lock, but finding a password is like finding a key.

    But I think your point is the strongest. It doesn't matter what either of us think. It totally depends on the justice system that has jurisdiction and those rules could be anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)