you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 64 points 9 months ago* (4 children)

Do you think this is about people disagreeing with their contents? That seems like a strawman. People disagree with one specific religion's doctrine being forced onto students.

But, since you asked, I could definitely do without these:

  • I am the Lord thy God. Thou shall not have strange gods before Me.
  • Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
  • Remember to keep holy the Lord's day.
  • Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife. (seems a bit male-focused)
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Not only male focused, but also considers the wife a property of the husband.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't say so. If it said instead "the spouse of your neighbor" it wouldn't consider the spouse a property of the other spouse. X of Y doesn't mean X is the property of Y. "Of" is just not a precise word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -35 points 9 months ago

    Oh, I just meant to talk about the TC by themselves, I'm sorry if I came across as if I were arguing about something else sneakily. Trust me, I wasn't. And I mean, you don't disagree with the last one, you just think it should be expanded, which is a reasonable suggestion. That's nice.

  • source
  • parent