you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 9 months ago* (5 children)

300 people working on hardware, 300 people working on software, 300 people working on various smaller aspects like basic research, marketing, quality testing, etc., and 100 people in associated staff like managers, hr, janitorial, administrators, etc.

Seems reasonable to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago (4 children)

    I don’t think that’s reasonable. 300 people full time to release 4 headsets in the last ten years? 300 people to build a custom Android version and a shitty VR chat clone?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago* (3 children)

    You may not think it's reasonable, but the evidence suggests that it is. If 100 people could do it then the market would be flooded with high quality standalone vr headset systems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago (2 children)

    Valve did it with like 350 people in the whole company.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 child)

    Valve's system isn't standalone, and wasn't trying to create a whole new vr platform like fb was trying to do

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 9 months ago*

    Yes, it is, and yes, they did. It can run PC games standalone, and Steam VR on SteamOS is a platform they created.

    (I’m talking about the Steam Frame, not the Valve Index.)

  • source
  • parent