Priscilla Chan’s decision to stop funding the school she opened to help struggling families shows the risks for communities reliant on wealthy private donors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 79 points 1 year ago (8 children)

This is why as much as I appreciate the philanthropy of the ultra wealthy, it's NOT a substitute for taxation

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Beyond just deciding when they want to stop at any time they dictate what’s worth the money.

    Can you imagine being able to say “nah, I won’t pay this tax because it’s not for something im passionate about”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Actually, the IRS is experimented with a psychological means of making people feel like they’re donating to certain things, Apparently, in focus groups, it makes people suddenly a lot less pissed about paying income tax if they can say “this goes to national defense” or “this goes to education.”

    Problem is you can’t actually give people a choice, just the illusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Oh for sure, it makes heaps of sense.

    If it worked like that for everyone, and somehow had the less exciting things covered too it could be a great system. But it’s mad that these people campaign against paying taxes then want the social praise for paying a fraction of it and getting social praise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Libertarian types tell you all the time that this is what philanthropy is for.

    No. No this is not what philanthropy is for, because the philanthropist can pull the plug anytime they want.

    And charities can decide who to help. That's probably the worst of it, and what makes libertarianism a thinly-veiled disguise for racism, or at the very least a caste system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    My idea of "perfect philanthropy" is something like the Carnegie Hall. While I think it is the government's role to provide places for art, I don't begrudge a city for having a more modest venue. So having a world class, tour de force concert hall is a pretty neat philanthropic project IMHO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Sure that's great if a rich dude wants to set up a trust and run a theater or a museum or whatever after they die.

    But the problem comes in when you have an NFP running a museum that's beholden to one or two key benefactors who want to decide everything, and they gotta listen or else there's no more money.

  • source
  • parent