you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (46 children)

Right, because they pull their own triggers, etc., etc....

Edit: To clarify to make absolutely certain you can't possibly think I'm agreeing with you, I'm not complaining about Grok, although chatbot "AI" are stupid fucking tools for tools, I'm comlaining about the PREDATORS who use chatbots to do sexual deviancy shit. Not unlike the ammosexuals/ICE agents who fantasize about using their ARs to kill women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (45 children)

    I guess I misinterpreted your comment. I thought you were trying to imply that all of the responsibility rested on the badly-behaving users and that the makers of Grok had no responsibility to prevent sexual harassment and CSAM on their platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago* (24 children)

    That is exactly what they are saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago (23 children)

    Another weirdo who thinks "and that's bad too" is a statement of absolution for predators and those who abet them.

    Is that because of No Child Left Behind?

    Has Lemmy adopted the "um aksuually" guy Reddit standard for writing analysis and media literacy?

    No, person of dubious ability to comprehend what you read, this is NOT what I am saying, this is what you want to believe that I am saying. For some bizarre ass reason.

    White knighting? Red-pill accusations misdirect?

    Please, feel free to explain your logic and thoughts on this.

    I am genuinely curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    Nope. Just think that we should all recognize the root evil here is the Nazi billionaire that is selling a child porn subscription service.

    You know. Because Nazi billionaires selling child porn subscription services is a real actual terrible thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    And what makes you think "and that's bad too" doesn't? Seriously. Explain your work.

    Was there not enough histrionics or wringing of hands and gnashing of teeth for you?

    So explain your logic and thoughts about why you think EVERY FUCKING RESPONSE needs to cater to your whims?

    The entire fucking planet knows that Nazi trillionaires selling a service that can be used for child porn, at least be accurate, is BAD. Are you serious right now?

    DO you hang around so many Nazi pedos that this needs to be constantly reiterated lest you forget?

    Holy moly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (20 children)

    Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.

    The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.

    That the combination of words that I used to describe shouldn't even be allowed to exist and will likely be a liner notes in any surviving history.

    If we are outraged enough to admonish anyone involved it should be the child porn profiteer, not relegating his moral failings under the broad category of "oh, yea, that's bad, too."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (19 children)

    Any dickless loser seeking out the material is a problem.

    Which is why I said as much in my very first response in this thread.

    The dude who institutionalized illegal porn is a worldwide threat to children. We are talking orders of magnitude more dangerous to individuals and to society.

    And what makes you think I don't/didn't believe this was true? Explain using full sentences, please.

    Thanks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    I'm suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.

    You are essentially arguing that "all crimes matter," which isn't wrong but is woefully misguided.

    It is about the framing of the narrative.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    I'm suggesting that Musk is creating a dangerous and unprecedented situation for children around the globe and that this should be everyones primary focus.

    And that's cool. Start your own post. No one can read your mind, bro. And honestly, few people appreciate intrusive misunderstanding. You might want to work on that.

    You are essentially arguing that "all crimes matter," which isn't wrong but is woefully misguided.

    Wrong. YOU INTERPRETED IT THAT WAY.

    "And that's bad too" is apparently your trigger phrase. Have a better thinker than you explain why you over reacted.

    It is about the framing of the narrative.

    And you're the narrative police, apparently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Wrong. YOU INTERPRETED IT THAT WAY.

    To use your words you seem triggered. You ok, bro?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Oh I'm fine. I'm just trying to get thru to knuckleheads who can't read.

    "Um Akshually" Reddit Guy who can't read is one of my pet peeves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You typing multiple paragraphs and then accusing the other user of over reacting is incredibly funny.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

    So, what you are saying is that we can't make judgement calls and that all crimes matter?

    You really haven't managed to say anything otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    So, what you are saying is that we can't make judgement calls and that all crimes matter?

    Holy fuck, what?

    You really haven't managed to say anything otherwise.

    The truly weird thing here is you think YOU have.lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    Really I've only rearticulated the same one-point repeatedly. I'm a bit shocked that we don't both hold consensus on that fact. But that's been my entire point.

    You are correct about one thing, you do remind me of Reddit. Somebody comes in with a difference of opinion and they must be flat out wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    The weird thing for me is the purity test mentality of /fuck AI.

    It smacks of "methinks thou dost protest too much" or an utter lack of reading comprehension when you folks can't even seem to understand I was agreeing with it.

    This place is literally the worst kind of Reddit and I'm now wondering if you all aren't predator/pedos given the response I've gotten here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    What makes you think I want to hang around pervs and pedos? LOL

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I have had Grok generate a succinct summary of how we got to this point in the conversation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Best work you've done so far.

    But then that's a loooow bar. lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 10 months ago (19 children)

    The makers of Grok are responsible for all of its sins, yes.

    But mostly I was referring to the men who use software like this for those purposes.

    But this is nothing new. I'm old enough that I predate even using Photoshop for things like this.

    No, the problem is always perverted men.

    And for the incels, no, women don't do shit like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    I don't disagree. But my point is that, if creepy, predatory men are so ubiquitous, so shameless, and such a known factor (which anyone with half a brain should agree they are) then isn't the fastest and most efficient way to minimize harm removing the tools of abuse from the hands of the abusers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    Sigh.

    So this is because I didn't paint with a broad brush and create a plan of action or are we tarring and feathering ANYONE associated with AI now (which I'm totally on board with, btw, just not something I bother writing in every statement I made)?

    The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.

    Should I castigate you for NOT making that statement? Does that make you a horrible person who supports sex offenders? Don't you feel guilty for NOT including that in EVERY reply or post you make?

    See how weird that is?

    I find it so odd that because I made a statement about the predatory men who fucking use AI to do this you weirdos think this means that doesn't include Musk and his team who aid and abet them.

    Like it's WEIRD that some of you jumped to that conclusion. It's not just you. I've been posting on the internet since the mid 90s and late stage Reddit was the first time I encountered that kind of thing and I'm not sure where it came from. Maybe it was always there and I just never encountered it until then.

    But DAMN it is WEIRD.

    I mena, there's writing analysis and media literacy, and then there's whatever this wild speculation shit is.

    Do better man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    The most efficient and effective way to minimize hard, in this case, would be chemical castration of all such abusers everywhere. Anything less is just cosplaying justice.

    Those drugs are actually of dubious utility unless you are just seeking to cause medical harm to people.

    And it has absolutely no bearing on AI. No amount of chemicals will stop grok, and from what I hear Elon's genitals may already be mangled and useless.

    You stop this sort of thing at the source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    Those drugs are actually of dubious utility

    Chemical, mechanical, whatever gets you even close to comprehending what I write.

    And it has absolutely no bearing on AI.

    So you're saying you want to just let these people roam the streets free to molest any little girl they find? Weird.

    You stop this sort of thing at the source.

    Good lord, I'm trying, but you can't seem to get it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

    It is a program. You stop the program at the source. And you do that by going after to do two authorize the program.

    It really isn't that hard. We are discussing the world getting flooded with dangerous and illegal images and we should hold the man who actually did it in a great deal of contempt.

    And chemical castration (or any other form) is about the least effective way of dealing with it. It is brutal and ugly for no reason.

    One of my life's inspirations was chemically castrated. It is a horrible thing to have to go through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Yea, we all liked Turing dude, you're not special.

    And why haven't you "stopped it at the source" if it bothers you so much that you're randomly attacking people on internet forums.

    Get up out of your gaming chair and do something about little keyboard warrior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Get up out of your gaming chair and do something about little keyboard warrior.

    That's actually a pretty funny claim. You do seem to be projecting a bit.

    My Ph.D. is in AI. Among other things I teach AI and other related subfields as well as computing ethics (a metric fuckton over the years). I study and publish on the state of AI systems and their ethical concerns and limitations. I'm currently working on policy for my university system.

    Each day I wake up and a portion of my responsibilities are to instill ethical behaviors in my students, and to support the world and policies around me in this area.

    I'm curious, Mr. Troll, are you doing anything in this particular arena besides popping a blood vessel over something that some random dude in the internet thinks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Wow, that old saying is true. If you can't do, you teach. I feel bad for your supposed students internet professor.

    are you doing anything in this particular arena besides popping a blood vessel over something that some random dude in the internet thinks?

    Yes, discovering this place can't even understand when someone is agreeing with them because they are so hard for their purity test.

    It's giving predators and pedos doing their best to dogpile someone who clearly understands the real issue are the predatory men using the tool, and not AI in general, because AI is a tool and predators/pedos have used tools like this since before the concept of AI existed.

    I'm getting that most of you are pissed off at AI because you aren't talented enough to get in on the action and would sell out to people like Musk in a heartbeat, but damn, is it necessary to smear shit everywhere while you do it?

    Rhetorical, don't bother "scree-ing" back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    And why haven't you "stopped it at the source" if it bothers you so much that you're randomly attacking people on internet forums.

    Shit, you are absolutely right. Why didn't I create laws and society that disallowed Musk to become who he is.

    Sorry about the oversight;

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Shit, you are absolutely right.

    Thanks. It was obvious when you're not nose deep in your own shit impotently railing at billionaires on a whatever you want to call Lemmy.

    The funniest thing to me was that you all dogpiled me because I didn't pass your anti-AI purity test when I was agreeing with you the entire time.

    So put down your keyboard title warrior and get to changing society. You are the Chosen One and it all hinges on YOU!

    Good luck!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    Anti AI? I'm one of the dudes who helps invent the ideas people use. XD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Ah, ok so /fuck_ai was a literal title for this place. Got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    I man can have hobbies. Like laughing at bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Why do you think I keep goading you pedos?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments