you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 10 months ago (13 children)

Assuming there's any truth to that, why wouldn't women just use the 6 in 1 shampoo?

...And man-pants with pockets, while we're on the topic. I suppose there might be issues in the hip-department there, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I think it's not so much the shampoo but a mix of most men using shorter haircuts and doing less damaging things to their hair, like hair colouring.

    And it's not like there aren't specialized shampoos targeting primarily men. I think I never saw a dandruff shampoo marketed towards women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Huh. Is dandruff not a thing that happens to women? I wouldn't know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Some already do.

    And man pants aren't that big of a hurdle to get used to. Just need to take measurements of waistband and inseam and you've got the size to look for in mens pants. Thats what I like about them: they have much better sizing labels than the nebulous/arbitrary size numbers on women's pants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Whatever works, right? Right now I'm wearing this really nice pair of sturdy heavy-duty felt-lined jeans from Duluth Trading Company which are supposedly made for women (albeit with perfectly nice pockets) - not that I care one whit. They fit perfectly, and are generally lovely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    It's nonsense, and men with longer hair who use 6 in 1 have bad results. Longer hair takes more treatment, hair is usually vitalized by oils from the scalp, so the further away from the scalp the more help it needs to stay healthy.

  • source
  • parent