Original Post:

wNKS3BvvSc8isAa.jpeg

I asked, concisely and simply, what was being hidden from us. Most of them just berated me, one user claimed the Syria conflict to which I provided a link to a recent UN Statement on which quite accurately reflected the conflict start to finish. Another user claimed that the recently declassified Nixon era documents about the Chilean revolution and coup, but I was able to find a 1973 archived Newspaper accusing the Nixon Admin of having a hand in it from Times Magazine meaning it was already a mainstream theory at the time.

LD7NmaffkIAo4Au.png

https://feddit.online/post/1341994

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 10 months ago (19 children)

Is your contention that there is no censorship whatsoever in American media?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (18 children)

    Look, mate, we both know you don't have an answer, just like the dozen people before you who tried and failed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    I'm not really trying to argue what they are, I just am genuinely asking. How could that possibly be the case is your view? Cops are arresting journalists without cause lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (16 children)

    The original post above and the discussion at hand is that the Tankies claim Capitalist Media is hiding the Truth from the USA, and I simply ask what they are hiding.

    Personally, I'm not sure a capitalist media system is capable of hiding something, because that would imply nationwide coordination, which simply doesn't exist in a free market. It's one of those "Jews Control the Weather" level of conspiracies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    Why does that imply coordination? I suppose there's a subtle difference between hiding something, and it simply not being there. You don't think that there's plenty of stuff that just doesn't get printed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    You know what you haven't done? Present an example.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    Wouldn't that be logically impossible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    You just said there are things which do not get printed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Surely there are right? Every day, millions of choices end up on the editing room floor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    On tens of thousands of different editing room floors, by different editors? No, I don't think they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (8 children)

    Not enough to justify the claim that "Capitalist Media is hiding the truth from you".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (7 children)

    Well... I mean don't a lot of voices and stories get LATRGELY silenced by the capitalist machine? I'm not saying that it DELIBERATELY stops any particular news, but rather that by design news basically needs to be profitable to survive in a capitalist society, and lots of news isn't profitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (6 children)

    What a great example, i'm sp glad you finally provided simple evidence of your claim. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    You don't agree with my characterization? You're not interested in engaging intellectually with this conversation?

    You're just going to keep demanding that I find you a specific news story that "corporate media" didn't run?

    Do you think this is a logical line of reasoning?

    For arguments sake and to give you something to work with, how about the catholic sex abuse scandals?

    Sure EVENTUALLY corporate media picked up these stories, when it was profitable and the social/political fallout was minimised, but at the same time those stories were buried for years (probably decades) by corporate media looking out for their own interests

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    What story? You've wasted so much of both of our time with failed attempts at sophistry and hypotheticals and presented zero fucking stories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I don't understand what you are looking for here, I literally just told you that catholic sex abuse scandals were routinely buried by corporate media for decades.

    If you are looking for a specific story, it doesn't exist because they didn't write it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    I can pull up catholic sex stories for you as old as the 14th century, mate. The West is not in the dark about Catholic Sex Stories.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I'm talking about the deliberate network of coverups knowingly moving accused priests to different jurisdictions to obscure this, which was eventually first outed in Boston in the early oughts.

    The minute before that story was printed, and the preceding decades where journalists and other figures were aware of this but did not publish the stories out of fear of reprisal, is an example of the capitalist media censoring a story through process rather than by deliberate action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment