you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 10 months ago (15 children)

If it was about genocide, trump wouldn't have won. She should have been better, no question. However, she was less leaning towards genocide in Gaza than he was. So if that was the decider it was vote her or third party or nobody, yet rump still got 70million odd votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (14 children)

    If it was about genocide, trump wouldn’t have won.

    That makes no sense. Polls confirm Republicans care far less about the genocide than independents and Democrats. You need to appeal to your base to win.

    However, she was less leaning towards genocide in Gaza than he was

    She literally promised no deviation from Biden's policies regarding Israel. Are you familiar with the story of the man with down syndrome who spoke his first and last words - "Habibi, please stop" - to a Zionazi attack dog who mauled him before they left him to die from his injuries, alone in his home? That's what Harris promised no deviation from. If you expect people to vote for that, your soul is compromised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    If you've read the news this past year, no doubt you'ld be aware trump is doing what he said he'd do, and also did his first term. Good job! She wasn't in charge when she made those statements. Trump IS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Was she in charge of her own mouth when she promised no deviation from Biden's policy of also letting Israel do whatever they want?

    You're defending an avowed genocidaire. Evaluate what led you here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Yes, you need to appeal to your base to win. However, if voters are choosing between two candidates with almost identical positions on a topic, that's not the deciding topic in that election.

    Maybe it should have been, but it wasn't. If those against genocide really cared about it as their single issuez they would have still voted Harris, who promised nonchangez as opposed to trump who said he'd let Israel do whatever they want.

    It's a fallacious argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

    If those against genocide really cared about it as their single issuez they would have still voted Harris, who promised nonchangez as opposed to trump who said he’d let Israel do whatever they want.

    ...Those are the same thing. Biden also let Israel do whatever they want.

    I am against genocide so I do not vote for genocide. A truly mind-boggling approach.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    But you still got genocide. Just now you have it with a side of fascist rule instead of without. Hope you're not melanated and near a border.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Oh no the inevitable consequences of liberalism

    Sorry I didn't continue to vote for the neo-Weimar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    By inaction you allowed a worse evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    By allowing Democrats to get away with their "lesser evil" sales pitch, you guaranteed what you incorrectly perceive as my inaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    Sorry, not inaction. Willful ignorance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Ok: By allowing Democrats to get away with their “lesser evil” sales pitch, you guaranteed what you incorrectly perceive as my willful ignorance.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Nothing incorrectly perceived about it. You willfully choose to be ignorant. The world moves on with you whether you choose to participate in it or not.

    You want to try to hide behind this singular position as if abstaining from voting solves or improves anything. It doesn't. You choose to live in a fantasy whereby your abstinence leaves you without blame. If anything, you and others like you become just as callused and evil as those in power. You all helped put them there because you all did nothing to stop it. You saw a bad option and a horrendous option and behaved childishly and gave up.

    You don't care what actually happens to anyone. You don't actually care if anyone lives or dies, because if you did, you'd have done something to slow or stop the current administration/regime from gaining any power at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago*

    Sounds good, I'll continue "hiding" behind being unwilling to sign my name to endorse putting a genocidaire in charge of a massive military force

    Good luck saving the world by voting for genocide, odd strategy but here's hoping

  • source
  • parent