633
Finnish presidential home and presidential castle raise trans inclusive pride flags for a week. (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 1 year ago (17 children)

The rainbow flag is already trans inclusive, the rainbow includes everyone

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    But its nice to have the actual colors on it though. I like switching between the 2 because they both look really nice.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    As a matter of color I don't like the abrupt transition from pastel cyan to brown... but it's nice for what it means.

    I like this Julia Feliz diagonal one much better: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Pride_Flag_by_Julia_Feliz_2018.svg

    idk it doesn't seem so jarring to me that way. Maybe because the absence of the bend avoids emphasizing the contact and thus contrast with the pastel cyan.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I believe the triangle having that shape is relevant because of other pride flags with that layout (demisexual at least) but I do find the one you posted a little nicer.

    I don't really understand why progress pride flag with the intersex flag is so rare though either.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    With the current significance of the movement represented by the "LGB Alliance" I don't think it's undue to stress the T.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    LGBTQ+ is 100% covered by the rainbow flag. It is absolutely ridiculous to claim otherwise.

    This is like insisting the American flag is only for Republicans.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -15 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Tbf, a lot of that was driven by the wave of transwomen getting mad that lesbians aren't attracted to them. And I never saw any pushback against these posts in the trans community.

    Was there right-wing groups amplifying the reach of these comments? Yes. Should the entire trans community suffer for a small number of assholes among their ranks? Hell no.

    Regardless, the lack of pushback in the trans community and its effects shows the need for groups to self-regulate to some degree. There's assholes in every group, and pretending that there aren't is dangerous.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    huh, sauce? I've never heard of any of that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The BBC has an article that gives a decent overview: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-57853385

    And Vice isn't doing anyone favors by leaning into the transphobia spin: https://www.vice.com/en/article/whats-wrong-with-the-no-trans-dating-preference-debate/

    A lot of this is also from personal memory. I was plugged into a lot of different communities 2018-2021on all sides of the aisle.

    Thankfully people aren't yelling at lesbians about this anymore, at least not what I've seen. Unfortunately, the damage has already been done.

    Also unfortunately, it seems that people aren't understanding the point of my original comment. And it's that every group has some number of assholes in it, and it's up to the group as a whole to make sure that said assholes don't ruin their reputation.

    This isn't meant to bash transpeople. It's meant as a cautionary tale to avoid letting a minority of assholes set how everyone else sees the group.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    My autisitic son insists that pink isn't a real color and has no business being included in any rainbow.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It doesn't have a corresponding wavelength in the spectrum of visible light, but as we perceive it to be there and have a name for it, it doesn't really matter that there's no specific wavelength it corresponds to.

    By that metric abstract things likely love, justice, duty, honour, could be argued to not be real either. Can't touch them or there's no corresponding physical thing in the world to measure them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent