82
Installing Linux on friend's new PC, which distro should he use? (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/linux@programming.dev
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

edit: Fedora it is then!

He will be running the AMD 9800 X3D w/ RX 9070 XT, B850 motherboard.

I am deciding between either Fedora (probably KDE) and Bazzite (also KDE), but I'm not sure whether an atomic distro would be better/worse for a newbie.

As far as I understand, atomic distros can be easily rolled back after an update, but you are unable to use apt/dnf/etx, you need to use Flatpak, I think. Would that be limiting for the average user? Also, does Bazzite have better driver support for newer AMD hardware compared to Fedora?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The most unpopular here is Ubuntu. It is however very stable and has flatpak like things called snaps that everyone hates because its not called flatpak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    So is fedora. Opensuse. Bazzite. Debian even

    So why Ubuntu then?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Fedora is IBM. Opensuse is okay but nothing special. Bazzite, I don't know what that is. I guess everybody has a fringe favorite. Mine is slackware. Debian is okay if you have a bit more experience.

    Ubuntu is a simple install with a slick interface and simply works. They get a lot of grief from the distro snobs but for a beginner I can think of no distro better suited.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Ubuntu is a simple install

    So is about every os by now. Ubuntu was special back in 2010 maybe. Now, no anaconda installer is the exception if you wannabe the arch btw guy, not the rule

    What is the exception by now, is breaking your entire OS with a rust rewrite, forcing a propriatery package format even when the user requests the normal package from the package installer, hiding security updates behind a subscription (even if its just your email), and putting Amazon ads in the OS

    When 90% of even niche Linux distros like Rhino, Vanilla or mint or Endeavour or Cachy or even fucking Artix have the same experience as Ubuntu, I'd rather recommend someone an Os that hasn't shown it would go the Microsoft way if it had the opportunity to

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Nah. That hasn't happened and you recommend fedora. If you were really worried about a distro going full microsoft you wouldn't have mentioned them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    If you don't decide to even parse my answers, there is no good reason to argue further.

    I have shown, that Ubuntu has done practices that go beyond subscriptions for extra Support, instead risking free users security. They have added Amazon ass once. They broke big parts of the os and made debugging harder by forcing a proprietary snap format, going against the decisions of users.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent