you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I think the user meant to say "lid down"

  • seat down: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing

  • seat up: easy for one group, slightly inconvenient for the other, unhygienic when flushing

  • seat and lid down: slightly inconvenient for both parties (but if it's consistent then you can build muscle memory), and hygienic when flushing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 10 months ago* (6 children)

    My point is, the entire problem is agreeing to one option in the first place. Which option you pick is irrelevant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Well rather OP is pointing out that there is a third option that both parties nay consider to be a fair compromise, and thus be more likely to agree to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    It doesn't matter if there are 2 or 20 options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It does if one of the options leads to a successful compromise. Based on the comments on this post, it seems that this solution has worked for a lot of households

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments