▲ 441 ▼ Anything else... (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone) submitted 1 year ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/adhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (14 children) Sincere attempt to measure the length of a coastline? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago Jupp. And he completely nailed it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] papalonian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (11 children) Is that your guess, or are you puzzled by the concept? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Pyro@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (4 children) Measuring a coastline creates a well known paradox: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I don't like to get reminded that never have the right measurement of things permalink fedilink source parent [–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Wow 😮 permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I learned a thing. Thank you. I argue that this is due to the poor definition of a coastline. I don't know why. I go into problem solving mode, and I'm like... yeah... poorly defined problem. Root cause found... uhh... now what. Coastline starts at where water reaches only high tide? No. Continental shelf? Certainly not. Point where building foundations are no longer stable? Maybe, but I don't know enough... yet. .... is this ADHD? Seriously, my psychiatrist thought I was right on the border. I dunno Edit: I'm dumb and misunderstood the problem. Disregard me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Hey, there. I see you are pedal-to-the-metal-awkward-stream-conciousness, I will need to see a license for that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I forgot the "are you serious". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I am. How else would you measure a coastline? The exact line is constantly changing with waves and the tide, so to get any kind of answer requires that you decide where the coastline is and mark it somehow. Driving nails into the waterline at the same water level and adding up the distances between them isn't really a bad approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) You don't need to mark things to measure them, especially when they change far faster than how long the marking takes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent [–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Somebody's gonna have to go back and get a shitload of nails. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago Jupp. And he completely nailed it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (11 children) Is that your guess, or are you puzzled by the concept? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Pyro@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (4 children) Measuring a coastline creates a well known paradox: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I don't like to get reminded that never have the right measurement of things permalink fedilink source parent [–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Wow 😮 permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I learned a thing. Thank you. I argue that this is due to the poor definition of a coastline. I don't know why. I go into problem solving mode, and I'm like... yeah... poorly defined problem. Root cause found... uhh... now what. Coastline starts at where water reaches only high tide? No. Continental shelf? Certainly not. Point where building foundations are no longer stable? Maybe, but I don't know enough... yet. .... is this ADHD? Seriously, my psychiatrist thought I was right on the border. I dunno Edit: I'm dumb and misunderstood the problem. Disregard me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Hey, there. I see you are pedal-to-the-metal-awkward-stream-conciousness, I will need to see a license for that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I forgot the "are you serious". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I am. How else would you measure a coastline? The exact line is constantly changing with waves and the tide, so to get any kind of answer requires that you decide where the coastline is and mark it somehow. Driving nails into the waterline at the same water level and adding up the distances between them isn't really a bad approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) You don't need to mark things to measure them, especially when they change far faster than how long the marking takes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyro@programming.dev 16 points 1 year ago (4 children) Measuring a coastline creates a well known paradox: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I don't like to get reminded that never have the right measurement of things permalink fedilink source parent [–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago Wow 😮 permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I learned a thing. Thank you. I argue that this is due to the poor definition of a coastline. I don't know why. I go into problem solving mode, and I'm like... yeah... poorly defined problem. Root cause found... uhh... now what. Coastline starts at where water reaches only high tide? No. Continental shelf? Certainly not. Point where building foundations are no longer stable? Maybe, but I don't know enough... yet. .... is this ADHD? Seriously, my psychiatrist thought I was right on the border. I dunno Edit: I'm dumb and misunderstood the problem. Disregard me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Hey, there. I see you are pedal-to-the-metal-awkward-stream-conciousness, I will need to see a license for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I don't like to get reminded that never have the right measurement of things permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) I learned a thing. Thank you. I argue that this is due to the poor definition of a coastline. I don't know why. I go into problem solving mode, and I'm like... yeah... poorly defined problem. Root cause found... uhh... now what. Coastline starts at where water reaches only high tide? No. Continental shelf? Certainly not. Point where building foundations are no longer stable? Maybe, but I don't know enough... yet. .... is this ADHD? Seriously, my psychiatrist thought I was right on the border. I dunno Edit: I'm dumb and misunderstood the problem. Disregard me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] LongLive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Hey, there. I see you are pedal-to-the-metal-awkward-stream-conciousness, I will need to see a license for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago Hey, there. I see you are pedal-to-the-metal-awkward-stream-conciousness, I will need to see a license for that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children) I forgot the "are you serious". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I am. How else would you measure a coastline? The exact line is constantly changing with waves and the tide, so to get any kind of answer requires that you decide where the coastline is and mark it somehow. Driving nails into the waterline at the same water level and adding up the distances between them isn't really a bad approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) You don't need to mark things to measure them, especially when they change far faster than how long the marking takes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (4 children) I am. How else would you measure a coastline? The exact line is constantly changing with waves and the tide, so to get any kind of answer requires that you decide where the coastline is and mark it somehow. Driving nails into the waterline at the same water level and adding up the distances between them isn't really a bad approach. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) You don't need to mark things to measure them, especially when they change far faster than how long the marking takes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (3 children) You don't need to mark things to measure them, especially when they change far faster than how long the marking takes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) I recommend reviewing the coastline paradox. It's an interesting problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) I know. That does not make it better. How could this be serious? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 1 year ago I'm really not sure you understand the concept. Maybe think on it a bit? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago Somebody's gonna have to go back and get a shitload of nails. permalink fedilink source parent