you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

That is possibly the worst faith interpretation of my statement. Everything is owned by someone not necessarily the same someone. For instance I own and am thus responsible for my property, someone else is responsible for their property hence everything is owned by someone.

What's the functional difference between communism and a monarchy? In both cased all property is owned by "the state" and can exercise control over that property however they please. Democracy doesn't work cos the people have no control of any property and thus are completely beholden to the state. Good luck protesting against the government when you have no food, water, means to communicate, and travel. What are u gonna do about the inevitable authoritarian takeover? Die?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    actually, ownership is a human invention and it is not necessary at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Ownership is simply the word we use to describe the person who ultimately controls and is thus responsible for any particularly thing. Please describe a system in ownership isn't a thing. The only one I can think of is anarchy until someone finds a gun and announces that everything now belongs to them and that their is nothing u can do about it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    anarchy until someone finds a gun and announces that everything now belongs to them and that their is nothing u can do about it

    it is anarchy. your gunman is a despot, and is not part of anarchism.

  • source
  • parent